blob: 0d6554bb688f38358fb358a2b289c0511a4efc44 [file] [log] [blame]
Jeff Vander Stoepf9be7652017-03-13 13:32:51 -07001# only HALs responsible for network hardware should have privileged
2# network capabilities
3neverallow {
4 halserverdomain
5 -hal_bluetooth_server
Tomasz Wasilczyk602b3032019-07-23 17:38:51 -07006 -hal_can_controller_server
Jeff Vander Stoepf9be7652017-03-13 13:32:51 -07007 -hal_wifi_server
Roshan Piusd7b34a42017-12-22 15:03:15 -08008 -hal_wifi_hostapd_server
Jeff Vander Stoepf9be7652017-03-13 13:32:51 -07009 -hal_wifi_supplicant_server
Amit Mahajan30073442018-03-12 17:12:09 +000010 -hal_telephony_server
Roshan Pius37ee61f2021-08-24 13:59:07 -070011 -hal_uwb_vendor_server
Chris Weir4ac3d742021-10-05 16:53:52 -070012 -hal_nlinterceptor_server
Benjamin Gordon9b2e0cb2017-11-09 15:51:26 -070013} self:global_capability_class_set { net_admin net_raw };
Jeff Vander Stoepf9be7652017-03-13 13:32:51 -070014
Jeff Vander Stoepd75a2c02017-06-21 12:46:21 -070015# Unless a HAL's job is to communicate over the network, or control network
16# hardware, it should not be using network sockets.
Pavel Maltsev8d7f5032018-05-15 14:16:57 -070017# NOTE: HALs for automotive devices have an exemption from this rule because in
18# a car it is common to have external modules and HALs need to communicate to
19# those modules using network. Using this exemption for non-automotive builds
20# will result in CTS failure.
Jeff Vander Stoepf9be7652017-03-13 13:32:51 -070021neverallow {
22 halserverdomain
Pavel Maltsev8d7f5032018-05-15 14:16:57 -070023 -hal_automotive_socket_exemption
Tomasz Wasilczyk602b3032019-07-23 17:38:51 -070024 -hal_can_controller_server
Jeff Vander Stoepd75a2c02017-06-21 12:46:21 -070025 -hal_tetheroffload_server
Jeff Vander Stoepf9be7652017-03-13 13:32:51 -070026 -hal_wifi_server
Roshan Piusd7b34a42017-12-22 15:03:15 -080027 -hal_wifi_hostapd_server
Jeff Vander Stoepf9be7652017-03-13 13:32:51 -070028 -hal_wifi_supplicant_server
Amit Mahajan30073442018-03-12 17:12:09 +000029 -hal_telephony_server
Roshan Pius37ee61f2021-08-24 13:59:07 -070030 -hal_uwb_vendor_server
Chris Weir4ac3d742021-10-05 16:53:52 -070031 -hal_nlinterceptor_server
Yifan Hongbe04b092021-06-07 12:37:31 -070032} domain:{ udp_socket rawip_socket } *;
33
34neverallow {
35 halserverdomain
36 -hal_automotive_socket_exemption
37 -hal_can_controller_server
38 -hal_tetheroffload_server
39 -hal_wifi_server
40 -hal_wifi_hostapd_server
41 -hal_wifi_supplicant_server
42 -hal_telephony_server
Chris Weir4ac3d742021-10-05 16:53:52 -070043 -hal_nlinterceptor_server
Yifan Hongbe04b092021-06-07 12:37:31 -070044} {
45 domain
46 userdebug_or_eng(`-su')
47}:tcp_socket *;
Jeff Vander Stoep84b96a62017-03-20 14:52:58 -070048
Michael Ayoubic3af6622021-06-24 02:02:07 +000049# The UWB HAL is not actually a networking HAL but may need to bring up and down
50# interfaces. Restrict it to only these networking operations.
Roshan Pius37ee61f2021-08-24 13:59:07 -070051neverallow hal_uwb_vendor_server self:global_capability_class_set { net_raw };
Michael Ayoubic3af6622021-06-24 02:02:07 +000052
53# Subset of socket_class_set likely to be usable for communication or accessible through net_admin.
54# udp_socket is required to use interface ioctls.
Roshan Pius37ee61f2021-08-24 13:59:07 -070055neverallow hal_uwb_vendor_server domain:{ socket rawip_socket netlink_socket packet_socket key_socket netlink_route_socket netlink_tcpdiag_socket netlink_nflog_socket netlink_xfrm_socket netlink_selinux_socket netlink_audit_socket netlink_dnrt_socket netlink_kobject_uevent_socket tun_socket netlink_iscsi_socket netlink_fib_lookup_socket netlink_connector_socket netlink_netfilter_socket netlink_scsitransport_socket netlink_rdma_socket netlink_crypto_socket qipcrtr_socket xdp_socket } *;
Michael Ayoubic3af6622021-06-24 02:02:07 +000056
Jeff Vander Stoep84b96a62017-03-20 14:52:58 -070057###
58# HALs are defined as an attribute and so a given domain could hypothetically
59# have multiple HALs in it (or even all of them) with the subsequent policy of
60# the domain comprised of the union of all the HALs.
61#
62# This is a problem because
63# 1) Security sensitive components should only be accessed by specific HALs.
64# 2) hwbinder_call and the restrictions it provides cannot be reasoned about in
65# the platform.
66# 3) The platform cannot reason about defense in depth if there are
67# monolithic domains etc.
68#
69# As an example, hal_keymaster and hal_gatekeeper can access the TEE and while
70# its OK for them to share a process its not OK with them to share processes
71# with other hals.
72#
73# The following neverallow rules, in conjuntion with CTS tests, assert that
74# these security principles are adhered to.
75#
76# Do not allow a hal to exec another process without a domain transition.
77# TODO remove exemptions.
78neverallow {
79 halserverdomain
80 -hal_dumpstate_server
Amit Mahajan30073442018-03-12 17:12:09 +000081 -hal_telephony_server
Jeff Vander Stoep84b96a62017-03-20 14:52:58 -070082} { file_type fs_type }:file execute_no_trans;
83# Do not allow a process other than init to transition into a HAL domain.
84neverallow { domain -init } halserverdomain:process transition;
85# Only allow transitioning to a domain by running its executable. Do not
86# allow transitioning into a HAL domain by use of seclabel in an
87# init.*.rc script.
88neverallow * halserverdomain:process dyntransition;