blob: 45227e42890a0164110d645a6d480a0fcd7ca020 [file] [log] [blame]
Jeff Vander Stoepf9be7652017-03-13 13:32:51 -07001# only HALs responsible for network hardware should have privileged
2# network capabilities
3neverallow {
4 halserverdomain
5 -hal_bluetooth_server
Tomasz Wasilczyk602b3032019-07-23 17:38:51 -07006 -hal_can_controller_server
Jeff Vander Stoepf9be7652017-03-13 13:32:51 -07007 -hal_wifi_server
Roshan Piusd7b34a42017-12-22 15:03:15 -08008 -hal_wifi_hostapd_server
Jeff Vander Stoepf9be7652017-03-13 13:32:51 -07009 -hal_wifi_supplicant_server
Amit Mahajan30073442018-03-12 17:12:09 +000010 -hal_telephony_server
Michael Ayoubi0be7c672021-06-10 02:01:52 +000011 -hal_uwb_server
Benjamin Gordon9b2e0cb2017-11-09 15:51:26 -070012} self:global_capability_class_set { net_admin net_raw };
Jeff Vander Stoepf9be7652017-03-13 13:32:51 -070013
Jeff Vander Stoepd75a2c02017-06-21 12:46:21 -070014# Unless a HAL's job is to communicate over the network, or control network
15# hardware, it should not be using network sockets.
Pavel Maltsev8d7f5032018-05-15 14:16:57 -070016# NOTE: HALs for automotive devices have an exemption from this rule because in
17# a car it is common to have external modules and HALs need to communicate to
18# those modules using network. Using this exemption for non-automotive builds
19# will result in CTS failure.
Jeff Vander Stoepf9be7652017-03-13 13:32:51 -070020neverallow {
21 halserverdomain
Pavel Maltsev8d7f5032018-05-15 14:16:57 -070022 -hal_automotive_socket_exemption
Tomasz Wasilczyk602b3032019-07-23 17:38:51 -070023 -hal_can_controller_server
Jeff Vander Stoepd75a2c02017-06-21 12:46:21 -070024 -hal_tetheroffload_server
Jeff Vander Stoepf9be7652017-03-13 13:32:51 -070025 -hal_wifi_server
Roshan Piusd7b34a42017-12-22 15:03:15 -080026 -hal_wifi_hostapd_server
Jeff Vander Stoepf9be7652017-03-13 13:32:51 -070027 -hal_wifi_supplicant_server
Amit Mahajan30073442018-03-12 17:12:09 +000028 -hal_telephony_server
Michael Ayoubi0be7c672021-06-10 02:01:52 +000029 -hal_uwb_server
Yifan Hongbe04b092021-06-07 12:37:31 -070030} domain:{ udp_socket rawip_socket } *;
31
32neverallow {
33 halserverdomain
34 -hal_automotive_socket_exemption
35 -hal_can_controller_server
36 -hal_tetheroffload_server
37 -hal_wifi_server
38 -hal_wifi_hostapd_server
39 -hal_wifi_supplicant_server
40 -hal_telephony_server
41} {
42 domain
43 userdebug_or_eng(`-su')
44}:tcp_socket *;
Jeff Vander Stoep84b96a62017-03-20 14:52:58 -070045
Michael Ayoubic3af6622021-06-24 02:02:07 +000046# The UWB HAL is not actually a networking HAL but may need to bring up and down
47# interfaces. Restrict it to only these networking operations.
48neverallow hal_uwb_server self:global_capability_class_set { net_raw };
49
50# Subset of socket_class_set likely to be usable for communication or accessible through net_admin.
51# udp_socket is required to use interface ioctls.
52neverallow hal_uwb_server domain:{ socket rawip_socket netlink_socket packet_socket key_socket netlink_route_socket netlink_tcpdiag_socket netlink_nflog_socket netlink_xfrm_socket netlink_selinux_socket netlink_audit_socket netlink_dnrt_socket netlink_kobject_uevent_socket tun_socket netlink_iscsi_socket netlink_fib_lookup_socket netlink_connector_socket netlink_netfilter_socket netlink_scsitransport_socket netlink_rdma_socket netlink_crypto_socket qipcrtr_socket xdp_socket } *;
53
Jeff Vander Stoep84b96a62017-03-20 14:52:58 -070054###
55# HALs are defined as an attribute and so a given domain could hypothetically
56# have multiple HALs in it (or even all of them) with the subsequent policy of
57# the domain comprised of the union of all the HALs.
58#
59# This is a problem because
60# 1) Security sensitive components should only be accessed by specific HALs.
61# 2) hwbinder_call and the restrictions it provides cannot be reasoned about in
62# the platform.
63# 3) The platform cannot reason about defense in depth if there are
64# monolithic domains etc.
65#
66# As an example, hal_keymaster and hal_gatekeeper can access the TEE and while
67# its OK for them to share a process its not OK with them to share processes
68# with other hals.
69#
70# The following neverallow rules, in conjuntion with CTS tests, assert that
71# these security principles are adhered to.
72#
73# Do not allow a hal to exec another process without a domain transition.
74# TODO remove exemptions.
75neverallow {
76 halserverdomain
77 -hal_dumpstate_server
Amit Mahajan30073442018-03-12 17:12:09 +000078 -hal_telephony_server
Jeff Vander Stoep84b96a62017-03-20 14:52:58 -070079} { file_type fs_type }:file execute_no_trans;
80# Do not allow a process other than init to transition into a HAL domain.
81neverallow { domain -init } halserverdomain:process transition;
82# Only allow transitioning to a domain by running its executable. Do not
83# allow transitioning into a HAL domain by use of seclabel in an
84# init.*.rc script.
85neverallow * halserverdomain:process dyntransition;