Update language to comply with Android's inclusive language guidance am: 0a92a62625 am: 64195288c2 am: 85402c9781
Original change: https://android-review.googlesource.com/c/platform/system/update_engine/+/1376416
Change-Id: I630b92f2b87ff754ef9c9e880a502c0e55c97d9a
diff --git a/payload_consumer/delta_performer.cc b/payload_consumer/delta_performer.cc
index d8f0ef5..4690d85 100644
--- a/payload_consumer/delta_performer.cc
+++ b/payload_consumer/delta_performer.cc
@@ -740,7 +740,7 @@
CheckpointUpdateProgress(false);
}
- // In major version 2, we don't add dummy operation to the payload.
+ // In major version 2, we don't add unused operation to the payload.
// If we already extracted the signature we should skip this step.
if (manifest_.has_signatures_offset() && manifest_.has_signatures_size() &&
signatures_message_data_.empty()) {
@@ -1570,7 +1570,7 @@
}
ErrorCode DeltaPerformer::ValidateManifest() {
- // Perform assorted checks to sanity check the manifest, make sure it
+ // Perform assorted checks to validation check the manifest, make sure it
// matches data from other sources, and that it is a supported version.
bool has_old_fields = std::any_of(manifest_.partitions().begin(),
manifest_.partitions().end(),
@@ -1663,7 +1663,7 @@
// corresponding update should have been produced with the operation
// hashes. So if it happens it means either we've turned operation hash
// generation off in DeltaDiffGenerator or it's a regression of some sort.
- // One caveat though: The last operation is a dummy signature operation
+ // One caveat though: The last operation is a unused signature operation
// that doesn't have a hash at the time the manifest is created. So we
// should not complaint about that operation. This operation can be
// recognized by the fact that it's offset is mentioned in the manifest.
@@ -1798,7 +1798,7 @@
resumed_update_failures > kMaxResumedUpdateFailures)
return false;
- // Sanity check the rest.
+ // Validation check the rest.
int64_t next_data_offset = -1;
if (!(prefs->GetInt64(kPrefsUpdateStateNextDataOffset, &next_data_offset) &&
next_data_offset >= 0))