Gracefully handle integer overflows.
Try sticking with integer-based math as much as possible for speed,
but switch to double-based math if we detect that we'd end up
causing an overflow.
New tests to verify.
Test: bit FrameworksNetTests:com.android.server.net.NetworkStatsCollectionTest
Bug: 65257769
Change-Id: I1ae35599be134f81850c0a3d86928b057fba1eff
diff --git a/tests/net/java/com/android/server/net/NetworkStatsCollectionTest.java b/tests/net/java/com/android/server/net/NetworkStatsCollectionTest.java
index 0c2ad38..9c10264 100644
--- a/tests/net/java/com/android/server/net/NetworkStatsCollectionTest.java
+++ b/tests/net/java/com/android/server/net/NetworkStatsCollectionTest.java
@@ -27,7 +27,10 @@
import static android.text.format.DateUtils.HOUR_IN_MILLIS;
import static android.text.format.DateUtils.MINUTE_IN_MILLIS;
+import static com.android.server.net.NetworkStatsCollection.multiplySafe;
+
import android.content.res.Resources;
+import android.net.ConnectivityManager;
import android.net.NetworkIdentity;
import android.net.NetworkStats;
import android.net.NetworkStatsHistory;
@@ -40,6 +43,7 @@
import android.test.MoreAsserts;
import android.test.suitebuilder.annotation.SmallTest;
import android.text.format.DateUtils;
+import android.util.RecurrenceRule;
import com.android.frameworks.tests.net.R;
@@ -53,6 +57,9 @@
import java.io.FileOutputStream;
import java.io.InputStream;
import java.io.OutputStream;
+import java.time.Clock;
+import java.time.Instant;
+import java.time.ZoneId;
import java.time.ZonedDateTime;
import java.util.ArrayList;
import java.util.List;
@@ -70,14 +77,27 @@
private static final long TIME_B = 1326110400000L; // UTC: Monday 9th January 2012 12:00:00 PM
private static final long TIME_C = 1326132000000L; // UTC: Monday 9th January 2012 06:00:00 PM
+ private static Clock sOriginalClock;
+
@Override
public void setUp() throws Exception {
super.setUp();
+ sOriginalClock = RecurrenceRule.sClock;
// ignore any device overlay while testing
NetworkTemplate.forceAllNetworkTypes();
}
+ @Override
+ protected void tearDown() throws Exception {
+ super.tearDown();
+ RecurrenceRule.sClock = sOriginalClock;
+ }
+
+ private void setClock(Instant instant) {
+ RecurrenceRule.sClock = Clock.fixed(instant, ZoneId.systemDefault());
+ }
+
public void testReadLegacyNetwork() throws Exception {
final File testFile = new File(getContext().getFilesDir(), TEST_FILE);
stageFile(R.raw.netstats_v1, testFile);
@@ -238,6 +258,9 @@
final NetworkStatsCollection collection = new NetworkStatsCollection(30 * MINUTE_IN_MILLIS);
collection.readLegacyNetwork(testFile);
+ // We're in the future, but not that far off
+ setClock(Instant.parse("2012-06-01T00:00:00.00Z"));
+
// Test a bunch of plans that should result in no augmentation
final List<SubscriptionPlan> plans = new ArrayList<>();
@@ -416,6 +439,28 @@
}
}
+ public void testAugmentPlanGigantic() throws Exception {
+ // We're in the future, but not that far off
+ setClock(Instant.parse("2012-06-01T00:00:00.00Z"));
+
+ // Create a simple history with a ton of measured usage
+ final NetworkStatsCollection large = new NetworkStatsCollection(HOUR_IN_MILLIS);
+ final NetworkIdentitySet ident = new NetworkIdentitySet();
+ ident.add(new NetworkIdentity(ConnectivityManager.TYPE_MOBILE, -1, TEST_IMSI, null,
+ false, true));
+ large.recordData(ident, UID_ALL, SET_ALL, TAG_NONE, TIME_A, TIME_B,
+ new NetworkStats.Entry(12_730_893_164L, 1, 0, 0, 0));
+
+ // Verify untouched total
+ assertEquals(12_730_893_164L, getHistory(large, null, TIME_A, TIME_C).getTotalBytes());
+
+ // Verify anchor that might cause overflows
+ final SubscriptionPlan plan = SubscriptionPlan.Builder
+ .createRecurringMonthly(ZonedDateTime.parse("2012-01-09T00:00:00.00Z"))
+ .setDataUsage(4_939_212_390L, TIME_B).build();
+ assertEquals(4_939_212_386L, getHistory(large, plan, TIME_A, TIME_C).getTotalBytes());
+ }
+
public void testRounding() throws Exception {
final NetworkStatsCollection coll = new NetworkStatsCollection(HOUR_IN_MILLIS);
@@ -437,6 +482,25 @@
assertEquals(TIME_A - HOUR_IN_MILLIS, coll.roundDown(TIME_A - 1));
}
+ public void testMultiplySafe() {
+ assertEquals(25, multiplySafe(50, 1, 2));
+ assertEquals(100, multiplySafe(50, 2, 1));
+
+ assertEquals(-10, multiplySafe(30, -1, 3));
+ assertEquals(0, multiplySafe(30, 0, 3));
+ assertEquals(10, multiplySafe(30, 1, 3));
+ assertEquals(20, multiplySafe(30, 2, 3));
+ assertEquals(30, multiplySafe(30, 3, 3));
+ assertEquals(40, multiplySafe(30, 4, 3));
+
+ assertEquals(100_000_000_000L,
+ multiplySafe(300_000_000_000L, 10_000_000_000L, 30_000_000_000L));
+ assertEquals(100_000_000_010L,
+ multiplySafe(300_000_000_000L, 10_000_000_001L, 30_000_000_000L));
+ assertEquals(823_202_048L,
+ multiplySafe(4_939_212_288L, 2_121_815_528L, 12_730_893_165L));
+ }
+
/**
* Copy a {@link Resources#openRawResource(int)} into {@link File} for
* testing purposes.