Fix nascent timer never get removed
By design, the nascent timer will be removed after a network
satisfied first request. However, this never happens.
Because the mInactive is false when that happens, so isNascent
is never true.
Furthermore, when removing a nascent timer, the inactivity
state can never be updated since no condition in the
updateInactivityState will be met to update the state correctly.
Thus, update inactive state accordingly when adding/removing the
nascent timer.
Test: TH
Bug: 184227264
Merged-In: I3c2563d4ae4e3715d0c6270344ba8f7ef067872f
Merged-In: I4c1521b6e0ef68ac489771a2ab6b09ef3e381577
Change-Id: I4c1521b6e0ef68ac489771a2ab6b09ef3e381577
(cherry-picked from ag/14060609)
diff --git a/service/src/com/android/server/ConnectivityService.java b/service/src/com/android/server/ConnectivityService.java
index 0166fc0..b804a51 100644
--- a/service/src/com/android/server/ConnectivityService.java
+++ b/service/src/com/android/server/ConnectivityService.java
@@ -7851,6 +7851,7 @@
// all networks except in the case of an underlying network for a VCN.
if (newSatisfier.isNascent()) {
newSatisfier.unlingerRequest(NetworkRequest.REQUEST_ID_NONE);
+ newSatisfier.unsetInactive();
}
// if newSatisfier is not null, then newRequest may not be null.
@@ -8355,6 +8356,7 @@
// But it will be removed as soon as the network satisfies a request for the first time.
networkAgent.lingerRequest(NetworkRequest.REQUEST_ID_NONE,
SystemClock.elapsedRealtime(), mNascentDelayMs);
+ networkAgent.setInactive();
// Consider network even though it is not yet validated.
rematchAllNetworksAndRequests();
diff --git a/tests/unit/java/com/android/server/ConnectivityServiceTest.java b/tests/unit/java/com/android/server/ConnectivityServiceTest.java
index e275a5e..52f7a1a 100644
--- a/tests/unit/java/com/android/server/ConnectivityServiceTest.java
+++ b/tests/unit/java/com/android/server/ConnectivityServiceTest.java
@@ -4567,9 +4567,8 @@
expectNoRequestChanged(testFactory);
testFactory.assertRequestCountEquals(0);
assertFalse(testFactory.getMyStartRequested());
- // ... and cell data to be torn down after nascent network timeout.
- cellNetworkCallback.expectCallback(CallbackEntry.LOST, mCellNetworkAgent,
- mService.mNascentDelayMs + TEST_CALLBACK_TIMEOUT_MS);
+ // ... and cell data to be torn down immediately since it is no longer nascent.
+ cellNetworkCallback.expectCallback(CallbackEntry.LOST, mCellNetworkAgent);
waitForIdle();
assertLength(1, mCm.getAllNetworks());
} finally {
@@ -11874,6 +11873,11 @@
internetFactory.expectRequestRemove();
internetFactory.assertRequestCountEquals(0);
+ // Create a request that holds the upcoming wifi network.
+ final TestNetworkCallback wifiCallback = new TestNetworkCallback();
+ mCm.requestNetwork(new NetworkRequest.Builder().addTransportType(TRANSPORT_WIFI).build(),
+ wifiCallback);
+
// Now WiFi connects and it's unmetered, but it's weaker than cell.
mWiFiNetworkAgent = new TestNetworkAgentWrapper(TRANSPORT_WIFI);
mWiFiNetworkAgent.addCapability(NET_CAPABILITY_NOT_METERED);
@@ -11882,7 +11886,7 @@
mWiFiNetworkAgent.connect(true);
// The OEM_PAID preference prefers an unmetered network to an OEM_PAID network, so
- // the oemPaidFactory can't beat this no matter how high its score.
+ // the oemPaidFactory can't beat wifi no matter how high its score.
oemPaidFactory.expectRequestRemove();
expectNoRequestChanged(internetFactory);
@@ -11893,6 +11897,7 @@
// unmetered network, so the oemPaidNetworkFactory still can't beat this.
expectNoRequestChanged(oemPaidFactory);
internetFactory.expectRequestAdd();
+ mCm.unregisterNetworkCallback(wifiCallback);
}
/**