Stop using netd parcelables in the framework.
The only actual users of these classes are in services.jar, not
in frameworks.jar. The only reason the framework depends on them
is that the code that converts to and from stable parcelables is
currently in the framework. Move that code to services and cut
the dependency.
These classes aren't used in the networkstack app so they don't
need to be in shared. They also can't be in shared because the
classes are not in the SDK. So put the conversion functions
directly inside their only user (NetworkManagementService).
Also remove the jarjar rules that rename the classes for use by
the NetworkStack app.
This does not actually remove the dependency from the build file,
that will be done in a future CL.
Bug: 128804404
Test: builds, boots
Test: atest FrameworksNetTests android.net.cts.ConnectivityManagerTest HostsideVpnTests
Change-Id: I027d50ba56091f5558f45e6e08f32e5912b2a82a
Merged-In: I027d50ba56091f5558f45e6e08f32e5912b2a82a
diff --git a/core/java/android/net/UidRange.java b/core/java/android/net/UidRange.java
index 793c82d..fa0eeb9 100644
--- a/core/java/android/net/UidRange.java
+++ b/core/java/android/net/UidRange.java
@@ -19,14 +19,17 @@
import static android.os.UserHandle.PER_USER_RANGE;
import android.os.Parcel;
+import android.os.Parcelable;
/**
* An inclusive range of UIDs.
*
* @hide
*/
-public final class UidRange extends UidRangeParcel {
- private UidRange() {}
+public final class UidRange implements Parcelable {
+ public final int start;
+ public final int stop;
+
public UidRange(int startUid, int stopUid) {
if (startUid < 0) throw new IllegalArgumentException("Invalid start UID.");
if (stopUid < 0) throw new IllegalArgumentException("Invalid stop UID.");
@@ -86,18 +89,28 @@
return start + "-" + stop;
}
- /**
- * DO NOT override "writeToParcel" and "readFromParcel" in this class.
- * The parceling code is autogenerated by the superclass.
- */
+ // Implement the Parcelable interface
+ // TODO: Consider making this class no longer parcelable, since all users are likely in the
+ // system server.
+ @Override
+ public int describeContents() {
+ return 0;
+ }
+
+ @Override
+ public void writeToParcel(Parcel dest, int flags) {
+ dest.writeInt(start);
+ dest.writeInt(stop);
+ }
public static final Creator<UidRange> CREATOR =
new Creator<UidRange>() {
@Override
public UidRange createFromParcel(Parcel in) {
- UidRange obj = new UidRange();
- obj.readFromParcel(in);
- return obj;
+ int start = in.readInt();
+ int stop = in.readInt();
+
+ return new UidRange(start, stop);
}
@Override
public UidRange[] newArray(int size) {