diff --git a/netd/BpfHandler.cpp b/netd/BpfHandler.cpp
index fb6d5b8..a090a54 100644
--- a/netd/BpfHandler.cpp
+++ b/netd/BpfHandler.cpp
@@ -85,8 +85,24 @@
     // U bumps the kernel requirement up to 4.14
     if (modules::sdklevel::IsAtLeastU() && !bpf::isAtLeastKernelVersion(4, 14, 0)) abort();
 
-    // V bumps the kernel requirement up to 4.19
-    if (modules::sdklevel::IsAtLeastV() && !bpf::isAtLeastKernelVersion(4, 19, 0)) abort();
+    if (modules::sdklevel::IsAtLeastV()) {
+        // V bumps the kernel requirement up to 4.19
+        // see also: //system/netd/tests/kernel_test.cpp TestKernel419
+        if (!bpf::isAtLeastKernelVersion(4, 19, 0)) abort();
+
+        // Technically already required by U, but only enforce on V+
+        // see also: //system/netd/tests/kernel_test.cpp TestKernel64Bit
+        if (bpf::isKernel32Bit() && bpf::isAtLeastKernelVersion(5, 16, 0)) abort();
+    }
+
+    // Linux 6.1 is highest version supported by U, starting with V new kernels,
+    // ie. 6.2+ we are dropping various kernel/system userspace 32-on-64 hacks
+    // (for example "ANDROID: xfrm: remove in_compat_syscall() checks").
+    // Note: this check/enforcement only applies to *system* userspace code,
+    // it does not affect unprivileged apps, the 32-on-64 compatibility
+    // problems are AFAIK limited to various CAP_NET_ADMIN protected interfaces.
+    // see also: //system/bpf/bpfloader/BpfLoader.cpp main()
+    if (bpf::isUserspace32bit() && bpf::isAtLeastKernelVersion(6, 2, 0)) abort();
 
     // U mandates this mount point (though it should also be the case on T)
     if (modules::sdklevel::IsAtLeastU() && !!strcmp(cg2_path, "/sys/fs/cgroup")) abort();
diff --git a/staticlibs/testutils/devicetests/com/android/testutils/DevSdkIgnoreRunner.kt b/staticlibs/testutils/devicetests/com/android/testutils/DevSdkIgnoreRunner.kt
index 950107c..2d281fd 100644
--- a/staticlibs/testutils/devicetests/com/android/testutils/DevSdkIgnoreRunner.kt
+++ b/staticlibs/testutils/devicetests/com/android/testutils/DevSdkIgnoreRunner.kt
@@ -42,7 +42,7 @@
  * the whole class if they do not match the development SDK as defined in [DevSdkIgnoreRule].
  * Otherwise, it will delegate to [AndroidJUnit4] to run the test as usual.
  *
- * This class automatically uses the Parameterized runner as its base runner, so the
+ * This class automatically uses the Parameterized runner as its base runner when needed, so the
  * @Parameterized.Parameters annotation and its friends can be used in tests using this runner.
  *
  * Example usage:
@@ -69,7 +69,7 @@
             null
         } else if (it.hasParameterizedMethod()) {
             // Parameterized throws if there is no static method annotated with @Parameters, which
-            // isn't too useful. Use if it there are, otherwise use its base AndroidJUnit4 runner.
+            // isn't too useful. Use it if there are, otherwise use its base AndroidJUnit4 runner.
             RunnerWrapper(Parameterized(klass))
         } else {
             RunnerWrapper(AndroidJUnit4(klass))