Secretkeeper implementation: in-HAL/nonsecure impl
Create the default/reference implementation of Secretkeeper HAL. Status
quo, this is non-secure implementation. In reality, the HAL should be
backed by a privileged component such a trusted app.
Bug: 291224769
Test: Topic includes VTS
Change-Id: I6a4ad50482d537f5438de6201275f4020cd827df
diff --git a/security/secretkeeper/default/Android.bp b/security/secretkeeper/default/Android.bp
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..1c39fa6
--- /dev/null
+++ b/security/secretkeeper/default/Android.bp
@@ -0,0 +1,37 @@
+/*
+ * Copyright (C) 2023 The Android Open Source Project
+ *
+ * Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License");
+ * you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
+ * You may obtain a copy of the License at
+ *
+ * http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
+ *
+ * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
+ * distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
+ * WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
+ * See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
+ * limitations under the License.
+ */
+
+package {
+ default_applicable_licenses: ["Android-Apache-2.0"],
+}
+
+rust_binary {
+ name: "android.hardware.security.secretkeeper-service.nonsecure",
+ relative_install_path: "hw",
+ vendor: true,
+ init_rc: ["secretkeeper.rc"],
+ vintf_fragments: ["secretkeeper.xml"],
+ rustlibs: [
+ "android.hardware.security.secretkeeper-V1-rust",
+ "libandroid_logger",
+ "libbinder_rs",
+ "liblog_rust",
+ "libsecretkeeper_comm_nostd",
+ ],
+ srcs: [
+ "src/main.rs",
+ ],
+}