Clarify SRBs in cellular transparency HAL
Bugs: b/283336425
Test: N/A
Flags: EXEMPT bugfix
Change-Id: Id4203269dd0fc9d596e18a197af806de2a3898a9
diff --git a/radio/aidl/android/hardware/radio/network/IRadioNetworkIndication.aidl b/radio/aidl/android/hardware/radio/network/IRadioNetworkIndication.aidl
index 34948fb..7b6fc6e 100644
--- a/radio/aidl/android/hardware/radio/network/IRadioNetworkIndication.aidl
+++ b/radio/aidl/android/hardware/radio/network/IRadioNetworkIndication.aidl
@@ -306,7 +306,7 @@
* operation, it becomes complicated when integrity is used to determine whether an
* emergency call is protected or not, hence its exclusion to simplify implementation.
* - 4G and 5G with multiple DRBs : emergency calls are protected under that RAT only if all
- * DRBs are protected (including IMS DRB).
+ * SRBs and DRBs are protected (including IMS DRB).
* - 4G and 5G DRB integrity: Since DRB integrity is not enabled in most networks, if both
* ciphering and integrity are taken into account to determine the value of
* isUnprotectedEmergency, the value will mostly be false, hence why it is excluded.