CursorInputMapper: share acceleration curves with touchpad
The new touchpad mapper implemented in Android 14 replaced our simple
cursor movement acceleration curves (where the acceleration factor
increased linearly with speed between minimum and maximum values) with
more sophisticated multi-segment curves. However, cursor movement using
mice remained on the old curves. For consistency and to improve pointing
accuracy, use the same curves for mice, too.
This is also a good opportunity to improve the documentation comments
and naming now that I've wrapped my head around the maths a bit better.
Bug: 315313622
Test: atest inputflinger_tests
Test: check pointer movement with a mouse, including changing the
pointer speed setting and checking that the movement speed changes
Change-Id: Ifcf43f4de6017f06b66f37d5e03a13cc257d92d5
diff --git a/libs/input/tests/VelocityControl_test.cpp b/libs/input/tests/VelocityControl_test.cpp
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..63d64c6
--- /dev/null
+++ b/libs/input/tests/VelocityControl_test.cpp
@@ -0,0 +1,129 @@
+/*
+ * Copyright 2024 The Android Open Source Project
+ *
+ * Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License");
+ * you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
+ * You may obtain a copy of the License at
+ *
+ * http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
+ *
+ * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
+ * distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
+ * WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
+ * See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
+ * limitations under the License.
+ */
+
+#include <input/VelocityControl.h>
+
+#include <limits>
+
+#include <gtest/gtest.h>
+#include <input/AccelerationCurve.h>
+#include <utils/Timers.h>
+
+namespace android {
+
+namespace {
+
+constexpr float EPSILON = 0.001;
+constexpr float COUNTS_PER_MM = 800 / 25.4;
+
+} // namespace
+
+class CurvedVelocityControlTest : public testing::Test {
+protected:
+ CurvedVelocityControl mCtrl;
+
+ void moveWithoutCheckingResult(nsecs_t eventTime, float deltaX, float deltaY) {
+ mCtrl.move(eventTime, &deltaX, &deltaY);
+ }
+
+ void moveAndCheckRatio(nsecs_t eventTime, const float deltaX, const float deltaY,
+ float expectedRatio) {
+ float newDeltaX = deltaX, newDeltaY = deltaY;
+ mCtrl.move(eventTime, &newDeltaX, &newDeltaY);
+ ASSERT_NEAR(expectedRatio * deltaX, newDeltaX, EPSILON)
+ << "Expected ratio of " << expectedRatio << " in X, but actual ratio was "
+ << newDeltaX / deltaX;
+ ASSERT_NEAR(expectedRatio * deltaY, newDeltaY, EPSILON)
+ << "Expected ratio of " << expectedRatio << " in Y, but actual ratio was "
+ << newDeltaY / deltaY;
+ }
+};
+
+TEST_F(CurvedVelocityControlTest, SegmentSelection) {
+ // To make the maths simple, use a "curve" that's actually just a sequence of steps.
+ mCtrl.setCurve({
+ {10, 2, 0},
+ {20, 3, 0},
+ {30, 4, 0},
+ {std::numeric_limits<double>::infinity(), 5, 0},
+ });
+
+ // Establish a velocity of 16 mm/s.
+ moveWithoutCheckingResult(0, 0, 0);
+ moveWithoutCheckingResult(10'000'000, 0.16 * COUNTS_PER_MM, 0);
+ moveWithoutCheckingResult(20'000'000, 0.16 * COUNTS_PER_MM, 0);
+ moveWithoutCheckingResult(30'000'000, 0.16 * COUNTS_PER_MM, 0);
+ ASSERT_NO_FATAL_FAILURE(
+ moveAndCheckRatio(40'000'000, 0.16 * COUNTS_PER_MM, 0, /*expectedRatio=*/3));
+
+ // Establish a velocity of 50 mm/s.
+ mCtrl.reset();
+ moveWithoutCheckingResult(100'000'000, 0, 0);
+ moveWithoutCheckingResult(110'000'000, 0.50 * COUNTS_PER_MM, 0);
+ moveWithoutCheckingResult(120'000'000, 0.50 * COUNTS_PER_MM, 0);
+ moveWithoutCheckingResult(130'000'000, 0.50 * COUNTS_PER_MM, 0);
+ ASSERT_NO_FATAL_FAILURE(
+ moveAndCheckRatio(140'000'000, 0.50 * COUNTS_PER_MM, 0, /*expectedRatio=*/5));
+}
+
+TEST_F(CurvedVelocityControlTest, RatioDefaultsToFirstSegmentWhenVelocityIsUnknown) {
+ mCtrl.setCurve({
+ {10, 3, 0},
+ {20, 2, 0},
+ {std::numeric_limits<double>::infinity(), 4, 0},
+ });
+
+ // Only send two moves, which won't be enough for VelocityTracker to calculate a velocity from.
+ moveWithoutCheckingResult(0, 0, 0);
+ ASSERT_NO_FATAL_FAILURE(
+ moveAndCheckRatio(10'000'000, 0.25 * COUNTS_PER_MM, 0, /*expectedRatio=*/3));
+}
+
+TEST_F(CurvedVelocityControlTest, VelocityCalculatedUsingBothAxes) {
+ mCtrl.setCurve({
+ {8.0, 3, 0},
+ {8.1, 2, 0},
+ {std::numeric_limits<double>::infinity(), 4, 0},
+ });
+
+ // Establish a velocity of 8.06 (= √65 = √(7²+4²)) mm/s between the two axes.
+ moveWithoutCheckingResult(0, 0, 0);
+ moveWithoutCheckingResult(10'000'000, 0.07 * COUNTS_PER_MM, 0.04 * COUNTS_PER_MM);
+ moveWithoutCheckingResult(20'000'000, 0.07 * COUNTS_PER_MM, 0.04 * COUNTS_PER_MM);
+ moveWithoutCheckingResult(30'000'000, 0.07 * COUNTS_PER_MM, 0.04 * COUNTS_PER_MM);
+ ASSERT_NO_FATAL_FAILURE(moveAndCheckRatio(40'000'000, 0.07 * COUNTS_PER_MM,
+ 0.04 * COUNTS_PER_MM,
+ /*expectedRatio=*/2));
+}
+
+TEST_F(CurvedVelocityControlTest, ReciprocalTerm) {
+ mCtrl.setCurve({
+ {10, 2, 0},
+ {20, 3, -10},
+ {std::numeric_limits<double>::infinity(), 3, 0},
+ });
+
+ // Establish a velocity of 15 mm/s.
+ moveWithoutCheckingResult(0, 0, 0);
+ moveWithoutCheckingResult(10'000'000, 0, 0.15 * COUNTS_PER_MM);
+ moveWithoutCheckingResult(20'000'000, 0, 0.15 * COUNTS_PER_MM);
+ moveWithoutCheckingResult(30'000'000, 0, 0.15 * COUNTS_PER_MM);
+ // Expected ratio is 3 - 10 / 15 = 2.33333...
+ ASSERT_NO_FATAL_FAILURE(
+ moveAndCheckRatio(40'000'000, 0, 0.15 * COUNTS_PER_MM, /*expectedRatio=*/2.33333));
+}
+
+} // namespace android
\ No newline at end of file