diff --git a/libs/binder/Android.bp b/libs/binder/Android.bp
index baeb565..2f58e12 100644
--- a/libs/binder/Android.bp
+++ b/libs/binder/Android.bp
@@ -191,6 +191,7 @@
         "google-*",
         "misc-*",
         "performance*",
+        "-performance-move-const-arg", // b/273486801
         "portability*",
     ],
 }
diff --git a/libs/binder/RpcState.cpp b/libs/binder/RpcState.cpp
index 38bd081..ed3ce24 100644
--- a/libs/binder/RpcState.cpp
+++ b/libs/binder/RpcState.cpp
@@ -262,8 +262,10 @@
 }
 
 void RpcState::clear() {
-    RpcMutexUniqueLock _l(mNodeMutex);
+    return clear(RpcMutexUniqueLock(mNodeMutex));
+}
 
+void RpcState::clear(RpcMutexUniqueLock nodeLock) {
     if (mTerminated) {
         LOG_ALWAYS_FATAL_IF(!mNodeForAddress.empty(),
                             "New state should be impossible after terminating!");
@@ -292,7 +294,7 @@
     auto temp = std::move(mNodeForAddress);
     mNodeForAddress.clear(); // RpcState isn't reusable, but for future/explicit
 
-    _l.unlock();
+    nodeLock.unlock();
     temp.clear(); // explicit
 }
 
@@ -704,7 +706,7 @@
     };
 
     {
-        RpcMutexLockGuard _l(mNodeMutex);
+        RpcMutexUniqueLock _l(mNodeMutex);
         if (mTerminated) return DEAD_OBJECT; // avoid fatal only, otherwise races
         auto it = mNodeForAddress.find(addr);
         LOG_ALWAYS_FATAL_IF(it == mNodeForAddress.end(),
@@ -720,8 +722,9 @@
         body.amount = it->second.timesRecd - target;
         it->second.timesRecd = target;
 
-        LOG_ALWAYS_FATAL_IF(nullptr != tryEraseNode(it),
+        LOG_ALWAYS_FATAL_IF(nullptr != tryEraseNode(session, std::move(_l), it),
                             "Bad state. RpcState shouldn't own received binder");
+        // LOCK ALREADY RELEASED
     }
 
     RpcWireHeader cmd = {
@@ -1164,8 +1167,8 @@
                    it->second.timesSent);
 
     it->second.timesSent -= body.amount;
-    sp<IBinder> tempHold = tryEraseNode(it);
-    _l.unlock();
+    sp<IBinder> tempHold = tryEraseNode(session, std::move(_l), it);
+    // LOCK ALREADY RELEASED
     tempHold = nullptr; // destructor may make binder calls on this session
 
     return OK;
@@ -1229,7 +1232,10 @@
     return OK;
 }
 
-sp<IBinder> RpcState::tryEraseNode(std::map<uint64_t, BinderNode>::iterator& it) {
+sp<IBinder> RpcState::tryEraseNode(const sp<RpcSession>& session, RpcMutexUniqueLock nodeLock,
+                                   std::map<uint64_t, BinderNode>::iterator& it) {
+    bool shouldShutdown = false;
+
     sp<IBinder> ref;
 
     if (it->second.timesSent == 0) {
@@ -1239,9 +1245,27 @@
             LOG_ALWAYS_FATAL_IF(!it->second.asyncTodo.empty(),
                                 "Can't delete binder w/ pending async transactions");
             mNodeForAddress.erase(it);
+
+            if (mNodeForAddress.size() == 0) {
+                shouldShutdown = true;
+            }
         }
     }
 
+    // If we shutdown, prevent RpcState from being re-used. This prevents another
+    // thread from getting the root object again.
+    if (shouldShutdown) {
+        clear(std::move(nodeLock));
+    } else {
+        nodeLock.unlock(); // explicit
+    }
+    // LOCK IS RELEASED
+
+    if (shouldShutdown) {
+        ALOGI("RpcState has no binders left, so triggering shutdown...");
+        (void)session->shutdownAndWait(false);
+    }
+
     return ref;
 }
 
diff --git a/libs/binder/RpcState.h b/libs/binder/RpcState.h
index ac86585..0e23ea7 100644
--- a/libs/binder/RpcState.h
+++ b/libs/binder/RpcState.h
@@ -168,6 +168,7 @@
     void clear();
 
 private:
+    void clear(RpcMutexUniqueLock nodeLock);
     void dumpLocked();
 
     // Alternative to std::vector<uint8_t> that doesn't abort on allocation failure and caps
@@ -268,11 +269,20 @@
         std::string toString() const;
     };
 
-    // checks if there is any reference left to a node and erases it. If erase
-    // happens, and there is a strong reference to the binder kept by
-    // binderNode, this returns that strong reference, so that it can be
-    // dropped after any locks are removed.
-    sp<IBinder> tryEraseNode(std::map<uint64_t, BinderNode>::iterator& it);
+    // Checks if there is any reference left to a node and erases it. If this
+    // is the last node, shuts down the session.
+    //
+    // Node lock is passed here for convenience, so that we can release it
+    // and terminate the session, but we could leave it up to the caller
+    // by returning a continuation if we needed to erase multiple specific
+    // nodes. It may be tempting to allow the client to keep on holding the
+    // lock and instead just return whether or not we should shutdown, but
+    // this introduces the posssibility that another thread calls
+    // getRootBinder and thinks it is valid, rather than immediately getting
+    // an error.
+    sp<IBinder> tryEraseNode(const sp<RpcSession>& session, RpcMutexUniqueLock nodeLock,
+                             std::map<uint64_t, BinderNode>::iterator& it);
+
     // true - success
     // false - session shutdown, halt
     [[nodiscard]] bool nodeProgressAsyncNumber(BinderNode* node);
diff --git a/libs/binder/include/binder/RpcSession.h b/libs/binder/include/binder/RpcSession.h
index 0750ccf..a323feb 100644
--- a/libs/binder/include/binder/RpcSession.h
+++ b/libs/binder/include/binder/RpcSession.h
@@ -51,6 +51,9 @@
  * This represents a session (group of connections) between a client
  * and a server. Multiple connections are needed for multiple parallel "binder"
  * calls which may also have nested calls.
+ *
+ * Once a binder exists in the session, if all references to all binders are dropped,
+ * the session shuts down.
  */
 class RpcSession final : public virtual RefBase {
 public:
diff --git a/libs/binder/tests/binderRpcBenchmark.cpp b/libs/binder/tests/binderRpcBenchmark.cpp
index 52ba9b0..5939273 100644
--- a/libs/binder/tests/binderRpcBenchmark.cpp
+++ b/libs/binder/tests/binderRpcBenchmark.cpp
@@ -102,9 +102,11 @@
 }
 
 static sp<RpcSession> gSession = RpcSession::make();
+static sp<IBinder> gRpcBinder;
 // Certificate validation happens during handshake and does not affect the result of benchmarks.
 // Skip certificate validation to simplify the setup process.
 static sp<RpcSession> gSessionTls = RpcSession::make(makeFactoryTls());
+static sp<IBinder> gRpcTlsBinder;
 #ifdef __BIONIC__
 static const String16 kKernelBinderInstance = String16(u"binderRpcBenchmark-control");
 static sp<IBinder> gKernelBinder;
@@ -118,9 +120,9 @@
             return gKernelBinder;
 #endif
         case RPC:
-            return gSession->getRootObject();
+            return gRpcBinder;
         case RPC_TLS:
-            return gSessionTls->getRootObject();
+            return gRpcTlsBinder;
         default:
             LOG(FATAL) << "Unknown transport value: " << transport;
             return nullptr;
@@ -254,11 +256,13 @@
     (void)unlink(addr.c_str());
     forkRpcServer(addr.c_str(), RpcServer::make(RpcTransportCtxFactoryRaw::make()));
     setupClient(gSession, addr.c_str());
+    gRpcBinder = gSession->getRootObject();
 
     std::string tlsAddr = tmp + "/binderRpcTlsBenchmark";
     (void)unlink(tlsAddr.c_str());
     forkRpcServer(tlsAddr.c_str(), RpcServer::make(makeFactoryTls()));
     setupClient(gSessionTls, tlsAddr.c_str());
+    gRpcTlsBinder = gSessionTls->getRootObject();
 
     ::benchmark::RunSpecifiedBenchmarks();
     return 0;
diff --git a/libs/binder/tests/binderRpcTest.cpp b/libs/binder/tests/binderRpcTest.cpp
index 0dc2028..d563cfc 100644
--- a/libs/binder/tests/binderRpcTest.cpp
+++ b/libs/binder/tests/binderRpcTest.cpp
@@ -163,7 +163,8 @@
             session.root = nullptr;
         }
 
-        for (auto& info : sessions) {
+        for (size_t sessionNum = 0; sessionNum < sessions.size(); sessionNum++) {
+            auto& info = sessions.at(sessionNum);
             sp<RpcSession>& session = info.session;
 
             EXPECT_NE(nullptr, session);
@@ -179,6 +180,7 @@
             for (size_t i = 0; i < 3; i++) {
                 sp<RpcSession> strongSession = weakSession.promote();
                 EXPECT_EQ(nullptr, strongSession)
+                        << "For session " << sessionNum << ". "
                         << (debugBacktrace(host.getPid()), debugBacktrace(getpid()),
                             "Leaked sess: ")
                         << strongSession->getStrongCount() << " checked time " << i;
@@ -241,6 +243,10 @@
         const BinderRpcOptions& options) {
     CHECK_GE(options.numSessions, 1) << "Must have at least one session to a server";
 
+    if (options.numIncomingConnectionsBySession.size() != 0) {
+        CHECK_EQ(options.numIncomingConnectionsBySession.size(), options.numSessions);
+    }
+
     SocketType socketType = std::get<0>(GetParam());
     RpcSecurity rpcSecurity = std::get<1>(GetParam());
     uint32_t clientVersion = std::get<2>(GetParam());
@@ -338,9 +344,15 @@
 
     status_t status;
 
-    for (const auto& session : sessions) {
+    for (size_t i = 0; i < sessions.size(); i++) {
+        const auto& session = sessions.at(i);
+
+        size_t numIncoming = options.numIncomingConnectionsBySession.size() > 0
+                ? options.numIncomingConnectionsBySession.at(i)
+                : 0;
+
         CHECK(session->setProtocolVersion(clientVersion));
-        session->setMaxIncomingThreads(options.numIncomingConnections);
+        session->setMaxIncomingThreads(numIncoming);
         session->setMaxOutgoingConnections(options.numOutgoingConnections);
         session->setFileDescriptorTransportMode(options.clientFileDescriptorTransportMode);
 
@@ -638,6 +650,32 @@
     proc.proc->sessions.erase(proc.proc->sessions.begin() + 1);
 }
 
+TEST_P(BinderRpc, SessionWithIncomingThreadpoolDoesntLeak) {
+    if (clientOrServerSingleThreaded()) {
+        GTEST_SKIP() << "This test requires multiple threads";
+    }
+
+    // session 0 - will check for leaks in destrutor of proc
+    // session 1 - we want to make sure it gets deleted when we drop all references to it
+    auto proc = createRpcTestSocketServerProcess(
+            {.numThreads = 1, .numIncomingConnectionsBySession = {0, 1}, .numSessions = 2});
+
+    wp<RpcSession> session = proc.proc->sessions.at(1).session;
+
+    // remove all references to the second session
+    proc.proc->sessions.at(1).root = nullptr;
+    proc.proc->sessions.erase(proc.proc->sessions.begin() + 1);
+
+    // TODO(b/271830568) more efficient way to wait for other incoming threadpool
+    // to drain commands.
+    for (size_t i = 0; i < 100; i++) {
+        usleep(10 * 1000);
+        if (session.promote() == nullptr) break;
+    }
+
+    EXPECT_EQ(nullptr, session.promote());
+}
+
 TEST_P(BinderRpc, SingleDeathRecipient) {
     if (clientOrServerSingleThreaded()) {
         GTEST_SKIP() << "This test requires multiple threads";
@@ -655,7 +693,7 @@
 
     // Death recipient needs to have an incoming connection to be called
     auto proc = createRpcTestSocketServerProcess(
-            {.numThreads = 1, .numSessions = 1, .numIncomingConnections = 1});
+            {.numThreads = 1, .numSessions = 1, .numIncomingConnectionsBySession = {1}});
 
     auto dr = sp<MyDeathRec>::make();
     ASSERT_EQ(OK, proc.rootBinder->linkToDeath(dr, (void*)1, 0));
@@ -668,6 +706,10 @@
     ASSERT_TRUE(dr->mCv.wait_for(lock, 100ms, [&]() { return dr->dead; }));
 
     // need to wait for the session to shutdown so we don't "Leak session"
+    // can't do this before checking the death recipient by calling
+    // forceShutdown earlier, because shutdownAndWait will also trigger
+    // a death recipient, but if we had a way to wait for the service
+    // to gracefully shutdown, we could use that here.
     EXPECT_TRUE(proc.proc->sessions.at(0).session->shutdownAndWait(true));
     proc.expectAlreadyShutdown = true;
 }
@@ -689,7 +731,7 @@
 
     // Death recipient needs to have an incoming connection to be called
     auto proc = createRpcTestSocketServerProcess(
-            {.numThreads = 1, .numSessions = 1, .numIncomingConnections = 1});
+            {.numThreads = 1, .numSessions = 1, .numIncomingConnectionsBySession = {1}});
 
     auto dr = sp<MyDeathRec>::make();
     EXPECT_EQ(OK, proc.rootBinder->linkToDeath(dr, (void*)1, 0));
@@ -722,8 +764,7 @@
         void binderDied(const wp<IBinder>& /* who */) override {}
     };
 
-    auto proc = createRpcTestSocketServerProcess(
-            {.numThreads = 1, .numSessions = 1, .numIncomingConnections = 0});
+    auto proc = createRpcTestSocketServerProcess({.numThreads = 1, .numSessions = 1});
 
     auto dr = sp<MyDeathRec>::make();
     EXPECT_EQ(INVALID_OPERATION, proc.rootBinder->linkToDeath(dr, (void*)1, 0));
@@ -742,19 +783,13 @@
 
     // Death recipient needs to have an incoming connection to be called
     auto proc = createRpcTestSocketServerProcess(
-            {.numThreads = 1, .numSessions = 1, .numIncomingConnections = 1});
+            {.numThreads = 1, .numSessions = 1, .numIncomingConnectionsBySession = {1}});
 
     auto dr = sp<MyDeathRec>::make();
     ASSERT_EQ(OK, proc.rootBinder->linkToDeath(dr, (void*)1, 0));
     ASSERT_EQ(OK, proc.rootBinder->unlinkToDeath(dr, (void*)1, 0, nullptr));
 
-    if (auto status = proc.rootIface->scheduleShutdown(); !status.isOk()) {
-        EXPECT_EQ(DEAD_OBJECT, status.transactionError()) << status;
-    }
-
-    // need to wait for the session to shutdown so we don't "Leak session"
-    EXPECT_TRUE(proc.proc->sessions.at(0).session->shutdownAndWait(true));
-    proc.expectAlreadyShutdown = true;
+    proc.forceShutdown();
 }
 
 TEST_P(BinderRpc, Die) {
diff --git a/libs/binder/tests/binderRpcTestCommon.h b/libs/binder/tests/binderRpcTestCommon.h
index 1918cf4..c1364dd 100644
--- a/libs/binder/tests/binderRpcTestCommon.h
+++ b/libs/binder/tests/binderRpcTestCommon.h
@@ -126,7 +126,11 @@
 struct BinderRpcOptions {
     size_t numThreads = 1;
     size_t numSessions = 1;
-    size_t numIncomingConnections = 0;
+    // right now, this can be empty, or length numSessions, where each value
+    // represents the info for the corresponding session, but we should
+    // probably switch this to be a list of sessions options so that other
+    // options can all be specified per session
+    std::vector<size_t> numIncomingConnectionsBySession = {};
     size_t numOutgoingConnections = SIZE_MAX;
     RpcSession::FileDescriptorTransportMode clientFileDescriptorTransportMode =
             RpcSession::FileDescriptorTransportMode::NONE;
diff --git a/libs/binder/tests/binderRpcTestFixture.h b/libs/binder/tests/binderRpcTestFixture.h
index d4d5968..6cde9f7 100644
--- a/libs/binder/tests/binderRpcTestFixture.h
+++ b/libs/binder/tests/binderRpcTestFixture.h
@@ -64,6 +64,21 @@
     // whether session should be invalidated by end of run
     bool expectAlreadyShutdown = false;
 
+    // TODO(b/271830568): fix this in binderRpcTest, we always use the first session to cause the
+    // remote process to shutdown. Normally, when we shutdown, the default in the destructor is to
+    // check that there are no leaks and shutdown. However, when there are incoming threadpools,
+    // there will be a few extra binder threads there, so we can't shutdown the server. We should
+    // consider an alternative way of doing the test so that we don't need this, some ideas, such as
+    // program in understanding of incoming threadpool into the destructor so that (e.g.
+    // intelligently wait for sessions to shutdown now that they will do this)
+    void forceShutdown() {
+        if (auto status = rootIface->scheduleShutdown(); !status.isOk()) {
+            EXPECT_EQ(DEAD_OBJECT, status.transactionError()) << status;
+        }
+        EXPECT_TRUE(proc->sessions.at(0).session->shutdownAndWait(true));
+        expectAlreadyShutdown = true;
+    }
+
     BinderRpcTestProcessSession(BinderRpcTestProcessSession&&) = default;
     ~BinderRpcTestProcessSession() {
         if (!expectAlreadyShutdown) {
diff --git a/libs/binder/tests/binderRpcTestTrusty.cpp b/libs/binder/tests/binderRpcTestTrusty.cpp
index 56e1d64..28be10d 100644
--- a/libs/binder/tests/binderRpcTestTrusty.cpp
+++ b/libs/binder/tests/binderRpcTestTrusty.cpp
@@ -52,9 +52,10 @@
 // threads.
 std::unique_ptr<ProcessSession> BinderRpc::createRpcTestSocketServerProcessEtc(
         const BinderRpcOptions& options) {
-    LOG_ALWAYS_FATAL_IF(options.numIncomingConnections != 0,
-                        "Non-zero incoming connections %zu on Trusty",
-                        options.numIncomingConnections);
+    LOG_ALWAYS_FATAL_IF(std::any_of(options.numIncomingConnectionsBySession.begin(),
+                                    options.numIncomingConnectionsBySession.end(),
+                                    [](size_t n) { return n != 0; }),
+                        "Non-zero incoming connections on Trusty");
 
     RpcSecurity rpcSecurity = std::get<1>(GetParam());
     uint32_t clientVersion = std::get<2>(GetParam());
diff --git a/libs/binder/tests/binderRpcUniversalTests.cpp b/libs/binder/tests/binderRpcUniversalTests.cpp
index 11a22b0..1f46010 100644
--- a/libs/binder/tests/binderRpcUniversalTests.cpp
+++ b/libs/binder/tests/binderRpcUniversalTests.cpp
@@ -463,7 +463,7 @@
                 auto proc = createRpcTestSocketServerProcess(
                         {.numThreads = 1,
                          .numSessions = 1,
-                         .numIncomingConnections = numIncomingConnections});
+                         .numIncomingConnectionsBySession = {numIncomingConnections}});
                 auto cb = sp<MyBinderRpcCallback>::make();
 
                 if (callIsOneway) {
@@ -491,16 +491,7 @@
                         << "callIsOneway: " << callIsOneway
                         << " callbackIsOneway: " << callbackIsOneway << " delayed: " << delayed;
 
-                // since we are severing the connection, we need to go ahead and
-                // tell the server to shutdown and exit so that waitpid won't hang
-                if (auto status = proc.rootIface->scheduleShutdown(); !status.isOk()) {
-                    EXPECT_EQ(DEAD_OBJECT, status.transactionError()) << status;
-                }
-
-                // since this session has an incoming connection w/ a threadpool, we
-                // need to manually shut it down
-                EXPECT_TRUE(proc.proc->sessions.at(0).session->shutdownAndWait(true));
-                proc.expectAlreadyShutdown = true;
+                proc.forceShutdown();
             }
         }
     }