diff --git a/runtime/indent/rust.vim b/runtime/indent/rust.vim
index b27d93c..7c055ec 100644
--- a/runtime/indent/rust.vim
+++ b/runtime/indent/rust.vim
@@ -1,27 +1,26 @@
 " Vim indent file
 " Language:         Rust
 " Author:           Chris Morgan <me@chrismorgan.info>
-" Last Change:      2017 Jun 13
-"                   2023 Aug 28 by Vim Project (undo_indent)
+" Last Change:      2023-09-11
 " For bugs, patches and license go to https://github.com/rust-lang/rust.vim
 
 " Only load this indent file when no other was loaded.
 if exists("b:did_indent")
-	finish
+    finish
 endif
 let b:did_indent = 1
 
 setlocal cindent
-setlocal cinoptions=L0,(0,Ws,J1,j1
-setlocal cinkeys=0{,0},!^F,o,O,0[,0]
+setlocal cinoptions=L0,(s,Ws,J1,j1,m1
+setlocal cinkeys=0{,0},!^F,o,O,0[,0],0(,0)
 " Don't think cinwords will actually do anything at all... never mind
-setlocal cinwords=for,if,else,while,loop,impl,mod,unsafe,trait,struct,enum,fn,extern
+setlocal cinwords=for,if,else,while,loop,impl,mod,unsafe,trait,struct,enum,fn,extern,macro
 
 " Some preliminary settings
 setlocal nolisp		" Make sure lisp indenting doesn't supersede us
 setlocal autoindent	" indentexpr isn't much help otherwise
 " Also do indentkeys, otherwise # gets shoved to column 0 :-/
-setlocal indentkeys=0{,0},!^F,o,O,0[,0]
+setlocal indentkeys=0{,0},!^F,o,O,0[,0],0(,0)
 
 setlocal indentexpr=GetRustIndent(v:lnum)
 
@@ -29,204 +28,259 @@
 
 " Only define the function once.
 if exists("*GetRustIndent")
-	finish
+    finish
 endif
 
+" vint: -ProhibitAbbreviationOption
 let s:save_cpo = &cpo
 set cpo&vim
+" vint: +ProhibitAbbreviationOption
 
 " Come here when loading the script the first time.
 
 function! s:get_line_trimmed(lnum)
-	" Get the line and remove a trailing comment.
-	" Use syntax highlighting attributes when possible.
-	" NOTE: this is not accurate; /* */ or a line continuation could trick it
-	let line = getline(a:lnum)
-	let line_len = strlen(line)
-	if has('syntax_items')
-		" If the last character in the line is a comment, do a binary search for
-		" the start of the comment.  synID() is slow, a linear search would take
-		" too long on a long line.
-		if synIDattr(synID(a:lnum, line_len, 1), "name") =~ 'Comment\|Todo'
-			let min = 1
-			let max = line_len
-			while min < max
-				let col = (min + max) / 2
-				if synIDattr(synID(a:lnum, col, 1), "name") =~ 'Comment\|Todo'
-					let max = col
-				else
-					let min = col + 1
-				endif
-			endwhile
-			let line = strpart(line, 0, min - 1)
-		endif
-		return substitute(line, "\s*$", "", "")
-	else
-		" Sorry, this is not complete, nor fully correct (e.g. string "//").
-		" Such is life.
-		return substitute(line, "\s*//.*$", "", "")
-	endif
+    " Get the line and remove a trailing comment.
+    " Use syntax highlighting attributes when possible.
+    " NOTE: this is not accurate; /* */ or a line continuation could trick it
+    let line = getline(a:lnum)
+    let line_len = strlen(line)
+    if has('syntax_items')
+        " If the last character in the line is a comment, do a binary search for
+        " the start of the comment.  synID() is slow, a linear search would take
+        " too long on a long line.
+        if synIDattr(synID(a:lnum, line_len, 1), "name") =~? 'Comment\|Todo'
+            let min = 1
+            let max = line_len
+            while min < max
+                let col = (min + max) / 2
+                if synIDattr(synID(a:lnum, col, 1), "name") =~? 'Comment\|Todo'
+                    let max = col
+                else
+                    let min = col + 1
+                endif
+            endwhile
+            let line = strpart(line, 0, min - 1)
+        endif
+        return substitute(line, "\s*$", "", "")
+    else
+        " Sorry, this is not complete, nor fully correct (e.g. string "//").
+        " Such is life.
+        return substitute(line, "\s*//.*$", "", "")
+    endif
 endfunction
 
 function! s:is_string_comment(lnum, col)
-	if has('syntax_items')
-		for id in synstack(a:lnum, a:col)
-			let synname = synIDattr(id, "name")
-			if synname == "rustString" || synname =~ "^rustComment"
-				return 1
-			endif
-		endfor
-	else
-		" without syntax, let's not even try
-		return 0
-	endif
+    if has('syntax_items')
+        for id in synstack(a:lnum, a:col)
+            let synname = synIDattr(id, "name")
+            if synname ==# "rustString" || synname =~# "^rustComment"
+                return 1
+            endif
+        endfor
+    else
+        " without syntax, let's not even try
+        return 0
+    endif
 endfunction
 
+if exists('*shiftwidth')
+    function! s:shiftwidth()
+        return shiftwidth()
+    endfunc
+else
+    function! s:shiftwidth()
+        return &shiftwidth
+    endfunc
+endif
+
 function GetRustIndent(lnum)
+    " Starting assumption: cindent (called at the end) will do it right
+    " normally. We just want to fix up a few cases.
 
-	" Starting assumption: cindent (called at the end) will do it right
-	" normally. We just want to fix up a few cases.
+    let line = getline(a:lnum)
 
-	let line = getline(a:lnum)
+    if has('syntax_items')
+        let synname = synIDattr(synID(a:lnum, 1, 1), "name")
+        if synname ==# "rustString"
+            " If the start of the line is in a string, don't change the indent
+            return -1
+        elseif synname =~? '\(Comment\|Todo\)'
+                    \ && line !~# '^\s*/\*'  " not /* opening line
+            if synname =~? "CommentML" " multi-line
+                if line !~# '^\s*\*' && getline(a:lnum - 1) =~# '^\s*/\*'
+                    " This is (hopefully) the line after a /*, and it has no
+                    " leader, so the correct indentation is that of the
+                    " previous line.
+                    return GetRustIndent(a:lnum - 1)
+                endif
+            endif
+            " If it's in a comment, let cindent take care of it now. This is
+            " for cases like "/*" where the next line should start " * ", not
+            " "* " as the code below would otherwise cause for module scope
+            " Fun fact: "  /*\n*\n*/" takes two calls to get right!
+            return cindent(a:lnum)
+        endif
+    endif
 
-	if has('syntax_items')
-		let synname = synIDattr(synID(a:lnum, 1, 1), "name")
-		if synname == "rustString"
-			" If the start of the line is in a string, don't change the indent
-			return -1
-		elseif synname =~ '\(Comment\|Todo\)'
-					\ && line !~ '^\s*/\*'  " not /* opening line
-			if synname =~ "CommentML" " multi-line
-				if line !~ '^\s*\*' && getline(a:lnum - 1) =~ '^\s*/\*'
-					" This is (hopefully) the line after a /*, and it has no
-					" leader, so the correct indentation is that of the
-					" previous line.
-					return GetRustIndent(a:lnum - 1)
-				endif
-			endif
-			" If it's in a comment, let cindent take care of it now. This is
-			" for cases like "/*" where the next line should start " * ", not
-			" "* " as the code below would otherwise cause for module scope
-			" Fun fact: "  /*\n*\n*/" takes two calls to get right!
-			return cindent(a:lnum)
-		endif
-	endif
+    " cindent gets second and subsequent match patterns/struct members wrong,
+    " as it treats the comma as indicating an unfinished statement::
+    "
+    " match a {
+    "     b => c,
+    "         d => e,
+    "         f => g,
+    " };
 
-	" cindent gets second and subsequent match patterns/struct members wrong,
-	" as it treats the comma as indicating an unfinished statement::
-	"
-	" match a {
-	"     b => c,
-	"         d => e,
-	"         f => g,
-	" };
+    " Search backwards for the previous non-empty line.
+    let prevlinenum = prevnonblank(a:lnum - 1)
+    let prevline = s:get_line_trimmed(prevlinenum)
+    while prevlinenum > 1 && prevline !~# '[^[:blank:]]'
+        let prevlinenum = prevnonblank(prevlinenum - 1)
+        let prevline = s:get_line_trimmed(prevlinenum)
+    endwhile
 
-	" Search backwards for the previous non-empty line.
-	let prevlinenum = prevnonblank(a:lnum - 1)
-	let prevline = s:get_line_trimmed(prevlinenum)
-	while prevlinenum > 1 && prevline !~ '[^[:blank:]]'
-		let prevlinenum = prevnonblank(prevlinenum - 1)
-		let prevline = s:get_line_trimmed(prevlinenum)
-	endwhile
+    " A standalone '{', '}', or 'where'
+    let l:standalone_open = line =~# '\V\^\s\*{\s\*\$'
+    let l:standalone_close = line =~# '\V\^\s\*}\s\*\$'
+    let l:standalone_where = line =~# '\V\^\s\*where\s\*\$'
+    if l:standalone_open || l:standalone_close || l:standalone_where
+        " ToDo: we can search for more items than 'fn' and 'if'.
+        let [l:found_line, l:col, l:submatch] =
+                    \ searchpos('\<\(fn\)\|\(if\)\>', 'bnWp')
+        if l:found_line !=# 0
+            " Now we count the number of '{' and '}' in between the match
+            " locations and the current line (there is probably a better
+            " way to compute this).
+            let l:i = l:found_line
+            let l:search_line = strpart(getline(l:i), l:col - 1)
+            let l:opens = 0
+            let l:closes = 0
+            while l:i < a:lnum
+                let l:search_line2 = substitute(l:search_line, '\V{', '', 'g')
+                let l:opens += strlen(l:search_line) - strlen(l:search_line2)
+                let l:search_line3 = substitute(l:search_line2, '\V}', '', 'g')
+                let l:closes += strlen(l:search_line2) - strlen(l:search_line3)
+                let l:i += 1
+                let l:search_line = getline(l:i)
+            endwhile
+            if l:standalone_open || l:standalone_where
+                if l:opens ==# l:closes
+                    return indent(l:found_line)
+                endif
+            else
+                " Expect to find just one more close than an open
+                if l:opens ==# l:closes + 1
+                    return indent(l:found_line)
+                endif
+            endif
+        endif
+    endif
 
-	" Handle where clauses nicely: subsequent values should line up nicely.
-	if prevline[len(prevline) - 1] == ","
-				\ && prevline =~# '^\s*where\s'
-		return indent(prevlinenum) + 6
-	endif
+    " A standalone 'where' adds a shift.
+    let l:standalone_prevline_where = prevline =~# '\V\^\s\*where\s\*\$'
+    if l:standalone_prevline_where
+        return indent(prevlinenum) + 4
+    endif
 
-	"match newline after struct with generic bound like
-	"struct SomeThing<T>
-	"| <-- newline indent should same as prevline
-	if prevline[len(prevline) - 1] == ">"
-				\ && prevline =~# "\s*struct.*>$"
-		return indent(prevlinenum)
-	endif
+    " Handle where clauses nicely: subsequent values should line up nicely.
+    if prevline[len(prevline) - 1] ==# ","
+                \ && prevline =~# '^\s*where\s'
+        return indent(prevlinenum) + 6
+    endif
 
-	"match newline after where like:
-	"struct SomeThing<T>
-	"where
-	"     T: Display,
-	if prevline =~# '^\s*where$'
-		return indent(prevlinenum) + 4
-	endif
+    let l:last_prevline_character = prevline[len(prevline) - 1]
 
-	if prevline[len(prevline) - 1] == ","
-				\ && s:get_line_trimmed(a:lnum) !~ '^\s*[\[\]{}]'
-				\ && prevline !~ '^\s*fn\s'
-				\ && prevline !~ '([^()]\+,$'
-				\ && s:get_line_trimmed(a:lnum) !~ '^\s*\S\+\s*=>'
-		" Oh ho! The previous line ended in a comma! I bet cindent will try to
-		" take this too far... For now, let's normally use the previous line's
-		" indent.
+    " A line that ends with '.<expr>;' is probably an end of a long list
+    " of method operations.
+    if prevline =~# '\V\^\s\*.' && l:last_prevline_character ==# ';'
+        call cursor(a:lnum - 1, 1)
+        let l:scope_start = searchpair('{\|(', '', '}\|)', 'nbW',
+                    \ 's:is_string_comment(line("."), col("."))')
+        if l:scope_start != 0 && l:scope_start < a:lnum
+            return indent(l:scope_start) + 4
+        endif
+    endif
 
-		" One case where this doesn't work out is where *this* line contains
-		" square or curly brackets; then we normally *do* want to be indenting
-		" further.
-		"
-		" Another case where we don't want to is one like a function
-		" definition with arguments spread over multiple lines:
-		"
-		" fn foo(baz: Baz,
-		"        baz: Baz) // <-- cindent gets this right by itself
-		"
-		" Another case is similar to the previous, except calling a function
-		" instead of defining it, or any conditional expression that leaves
-		" an open paren:
-		"
-		" foo(baz,
-		"     baz);
-		"
-		" if baz && (foo ||
-		"            bar) {
-		"
-		" Another case is when the current line is a new match arm.
-		"
-		" There are probably other cases where we don't want to do this as
-		" well. Add them as needed.
-		return indent(prevlinenum)
-	endif
+    if l:last_prevline_character ==# ","
+                \ && s:get_line_trimmed(a:lnum) !~# '^\s*[\[\]{})]'
+                \ && prevline !~# '^\s*fn\s'
+                \ && prevline !~# '([^()]\+,$'
+                \ && s:get_line_trimmed(a:lnum) !~# '^\s*\S\+\s*=>'
+        " Oh ho! The previous line ended in a comma! I bet cindent will try to
+        " take this too far... For now, let's normally use the previous line's
+        " indent.
 
-	if !has("patch-7.4.355")
-		" cindent before 7.4.355 doesn't do the module scope well at all; e.g.::
-		"
-		" static FOO : &'static [bool] = [
-		" true,
-		"	 false,
-		"	 false,
-		"	 true,
-		"	 ];
-		"
-		"	 uh oh, next statement is indented further!
+        " One case where this doesn't work out is where *this* line contains
+        " square or curly brackets; then we normally *do* want to be indenting
+        " further.
+        "
+        " Another case where we don't want to is one like a function
+        " definition with arguments spread over multiple lines:
+        "
+        " fn foo(baz: Baz,
+        "        baz: Baz) // <-- cindent gets this right by itself
+        "
+        " Another case is similar to the previous, except calling a function
+        " instead of defining it, or any conditional expression that leaves
+        " an open paren:
+        "
+        " foo(baz,
+        "     baz);
+        "
+        " if baz && (foo ||
+        "            bar) {
+        "
+        " Another case is when the current line is a new match arm.
+        "
+        " There are probably other cases where we don't want to do this as
+        " well. Add them as needed.
+        return indent(prevlinenum)
+    endif
 
-		" Note that this does *not* apply the line continuation pattern properly;
-		" that's too hard to do correctly for my liking at present, so I'll just
-		" start with these two main cases (square brackets and not returning to
-		" column zero)
+    if !has("patch-7.4.355")
+        " cindent before 7.4.355 doesn't do the module scope well at all; e.g.::
+        "
+        " static FOO : &'static [bool] = [
+        " true,
+        "	 false,
+        "	 false,
+        "	 true,
+        "	 ];
+        "
+        "	 uh oh, next statement is indented further!
 
-		call cursor(a:lnum, 1)
-		if searchpair('{\|(', '', '}\|)', 'nbW',
-					\ 's:is_string_comment(line("."), col("."))') == 0
-			if searchpair('\[', '', '\]', 'nbW',
-						\ 's:is_string_comment(line("."), col("."))') == 0
-				" Global scope, should be zero
-				return 0
-			else
-				" At the module scope, inside square brackets only
-				"if getline(a:lnum)[0] == ']' || search('\[', '', '\]', 'nW') == a:lnum
-				if line =~ "^\\s*]"
-					" It's the closing line, dedent it
-					return 0
-				else
-					return shiftwidth()
-				endif
-			endif
-		endif
-	endif
+        " Note that this does *not* apply the line continuation pattern properly;
+        " that's too hard to do correctly for my liking at present, so I'll just
+        " start with these two main cases (square brackets and not returning to
+        " column zero)
 
-	" Fall back on cindent, which does it mostly right
-	return cindent(a:lnum)
+        call cursor(a:lnum, 1)
+        if searchpair('{\|(', '', '}\|)', 'nbW',
+                    \ 's:is_string_comment(line("."), col("."))') == 0
+            if searchpair('\[', '', '\]', 'nbW',
+                        \ 's:is_string_comment(line("."), col("."))') == 0
+                " Global scope, should be zero
+                return 0
+            else
+                " At the module scope, inside square brackets only
+                "if getline(a:lnum)[0] == ']' || search('\[', '', '\]', 'nW') == a:lnum
+                if line =~# "^\\s*]"
+                    " It's the closing line, dedent it
+                    return 0
+                else
+                    return &shiftwidth
+                endif
+            endif
+        endif
+    endif
+
+    " Fall back on cindent, which does it mostly right
+    return cindent(a:lnum)
 endfunction
 
+" vint: -ProhibitAbbreviationOption
 let &cpo = s:save_cpo
 unlet s:save_cpo
+" vint: +ProhibitAbbreviationOption
+
+" vim: set et sw=4 sts=4 ts=8: