patch 9.1.0052: Patch 9.1.0041 causes regressions for users
Problem: Patch 9.1.0041 causes regressions for users
(Gleb Fotengauer-Malinovskiy)
Solution: Revert 9.1.0041 and restore old behaviour
Revert "patch 9.1.0041: xxd -i may generate incorrect C statements"
This reverts commit 7062be13129985fe297b9a8e59c57b8f0db61b8f.
Signed-off-by: Christian Brabandt <cb@256bit.org>
diff --git a/src/xxd/xxd.c b/src/xxd/xxd.c
index 75de982..a5f5f04 100644
--- a/src/xxd/xxd.c
+++ b/src/xxd/xxd.c
@@ -60,6 +60,7 @@
* 06.10.2023 enable -r -b to reverse bit dumps
* 12.01.2024 disable auto-conversion for z/OS (MVS)
* 17.01.2024 use size_t instead of usigned int for code-generation (-i), #13876
+ * 25.01.2024 revert the previous patch (size_t instead of unsigned int)
*
* (c) 1990-1998 by Juergen Weigert (jnweiger@gmail.com)
*
@@ -140,7 +141,7 @@
# endif
#endif
-char version[] = "xxd 2024-01-17 by Juergen Weigert et al.";
+char version[] = "xxd 2024-01-25 by Juergen Weigert et al.";
#ifdef WIN32
char osver[] = " (Win32)";
#else
@@ -978,7 +979,7 @@
if (varname != NULL)
{
fputs_or_die("};\n", fpo);
- FPRINTF_OR_DIE((fpo, "size_t %s", isdigit((unsigned char)varname[0]) ? "__" : ""));
+ FPRINTF_OR_DIE((fpo, "unsigned int %s", isdigit((unsigned char)varname[0]) ? "__" : ""));
for (e = 0; (c = varname[e]) != 0; e++)
putc_or_die(isalnum((unsigned char)c) ? CONDITIONAL_CAPITALIZE(c) : '_', fpo);
FPRINTF_OR_DIE((fpo, "_%s = %d;\n", capitalize ? "LEN" : "len", p));