patch 8.2.4409: Vim9: some code not covered by tests
Problem: Vim9: some code not covered by tests.
Solution: Add a few more tests. Fix reported line number.
diff --git a/src/vim9execute.c b/src/vim9execute.c
index 1c5dd74..317d1c3 100644
--- a/src/vim9execute.c
+++ b/src/vim9execute.c
@@ -1998,12 +1998,12 @@
// Stack contains:
// -2 index
// -1 dict or list
+ SOURCING_LNUM = iptr->isn_lnum;
if (tv_dest->v_type == VAR_DICT)
{
// unlet a dict item, index must be a string
if (tv_idx->v_type != VAR_STRING && tv_idx->v_type != VAR_NUMBER)
{
- SOURCING_LNUM = iptr->isn_lnum;
semsg(_(e_expected_str_but_got_str),
vartype_name(VAR_STRING),
vartype_name(tv_idx->v_type));
@@ -2020,7 +2020,6 @@
status = FAIL;
else
{
- SOURCING_LNUM = iptr->isn_lnum;
if (tv_idx->v_type == VAR_STRING)
{
key = tv_idx->vval.v_string;
@@ -2053,7 +2052,6 @@
else if (tv_dest->v_type == VAR_LIST)
{
// unlet a List item, index must be a number
- SOURCING_LNUM = iptr->isn_lnum;
if (check_for_number(tv_idx) == FAIL)
{
status = FAIL;
@@ -2072,7 +2070,6 @@
if (li == NULL)
{
- SOURCING_LNUM = iptr->isn_lnum;
semsg(_(e_list_index_out_of_range_nr), n);
status = FAIL;
}
@@ -2133,7 +2130,11 @@
li = list_find_index(l, &n1);
if (li == NULL)
+ {
+ semsg(_(e_list_index_out_of_range_nr),
+ (long)tv_idx1->vval.v_number);
status = FAIL;
+ }
else
{
if (n1 < 0)
@@ -2143,7 +2144,10 @@
listitem_T *li2 = list_find(l, n2);
if (li2 == NULL)
+ {
+ semsg(_(e_list_index_out_of_range_nr), n2);
status = FAIL;
+ }
else
n2 = list_idx_of_item(l, li2);
}