patch 8.2.0716: Vim9: another memory leak
Problem: Vim9: another memory leak.
Solution: Clear typval when failing.
diff --git a/src/version.c b/src/version.c
index 7434486..c8361eb 100644
--- a/src/version.c
+++ b/src/version.c
@@ -747,6 +747,8 @@
static int included_patches[] =
{ /* Add new patch number below this line */
/**/
+ 716,
+/**/
715,
/**/
714,
diff --git a/src/vim9compile.c b/src/vim9compile.c
index 3d3b3c3..67ca3de 100644
--- a/src/vim9compile.c
+++ b/src/vim9compile.c
@@ -4074,12 +4074,16 @@
return FAIL;
}
+ // Handle following "[]", ".member", etc.
+ // Then deal with prefixed '-', '+' and '!', if not done already.
if (compile_subscript(arg, cctx, &start_leader, end_leader,
- bef1_tv, bef2_tv, new_tv) == FAIL)
+ bef1_tv, bef2_tv, new_tv) == FAIL
+ || compile_leader(cctx, start_leader, end_leader) == FAIL)
+ {
+ clear_tv(new_tv);
return FAIL;
-
- // Now deal with prefixed '-', '+' and '!', if not done already.
- return compile_leader(cctx, start_leader, end_leader);
+ }
+ return OK;
}
/*
@@ -4187,6 +4191,7 @@
{
char_u buf[3];
+ clear_tv(&tv1);
vim_strncpy(buf, op, oplen);
semsg(_(e_white_both), buf);
return FAIL;
@@ -4194,12 +4199,18 @@
*arg = skipwhite(op + oplen);
if (may_get_next_line(op + oplen, arg, cctx) == FAIL)
+ {
+ clear_tv(&tv1);
return FAIL;
+ }
// get the second expression
tv2.v_type = VAR_UNKNOWN;
if (compile_expr6(arg, cctx, &tv1, &tv2) == FAIL)
+ {
+ clear_tv(&tv1);
return FAIL;
+ }
if (*op == '+' && tv1.v_type == VAR_NUMBER && tv2.v_type == VAR_NUMBER)
{