patch 8.2.2645: using inline function is not properly tested
Problem: Using inline function is not properly tested.
Solution: Add test cases, esp. for errors. Minor code improvements.
diff --git a/src/userfunc.c b/src/userfunc.c
index c9c7bc7..5766941 100644
--- a/src/userfunc.c
+++ b/src/userfunc.c
@@ -731,13 +731,16 @@
else if (line_arg != NULL && *skipwhite(line_arg) != NUL)
nextcmd = line_arg;
else if (*p != NUL && *p != (vim9_function ? '#' : '"')
- && p_verbose > 0
- && eap->cmdidx != CMD_block)
- give_warning2(eap->cmdidx == CMD_def
- ? (char_u *)_("W1001: Text found after :enddef: %s")
- : (char_u *)_("W22: Text found after :endfunction: %s"),
- p, TRUE);
- if (nextcmd != NULL)
+ && (vim9_function || p_verbose > 0))
+ {
+ if (eap->cmdidx == CMD_def)
+ semsg(_(e_text_found_after_enddef_str), p);
+ else
+ give_warning2((char_u *)
+ _("W22: Text found after :endfunction: %s"),
+ p, TRUE);
+ }
+ if (nextcmd != NULL && *skipwhite(nextcmd) != NUL)
{
// Another command follows. If the line came from "eap"
// we can simply point into it, otherwise we need to