patch 9.1.0022: Coverity complains about improper use of negative value
Problem: Coverity complains about improper use of negative value
Solution: Add a condition to validate that keytyped is larger or equal
to 0
Apparently patch 9.1.0006 made it more explicit for Coverity, that the
TOLOWER_LOC() macros do not handle negative values properly. However,
that condition has always been there even before that, so add a
condition to verify that keytyped is indeed at least 0
closes: #13824
Signed-off-by: Christian Brabandt <cb@256bit.org>
diff --git a/src/cindent.c b/src/cindent.c
index 6289422..cf18441 100644
--- a/src/cindent.c
+++ b/src/cindent.c
@@ -4108,7 +4108,8 @@
}
else
// TODO: multi-byte
- if (keytyped == (int)p[-1] || (icase && keytyped < 256
+ if (keytyped == (int)p[-1] || (icase
+ && keytyped < 256 && keytyped >= 0
&& TOLOWER_LOC(keytyped) == TOLOWER_LOC((int)p[-1])))
{
line = ml_get_cursor();
diff --git a/src/version.c b/src/version.c
index b221faa..562ba13 100644
--- a/src/version.c
+++ b/src/version.c
@@ -705,6 +705,8 @@
static int included_patches[] =
{ /* Add new patch number below this line */
/**/
+ 22,
+/**/
21,
/**/
20,