patch 9.1.0162: problem with writing extended attributes on failure
Problem: problem with writing extended attributes on failure
Solution: Change return type to ssize_t and check listxattr's return
value correctly on failure (Paul Tagliamonte)
The existing logic will return when the listxattr call returns with the
errno set to ENOTSUP (or a size of 0 bytes), without checking to see if
listxattr actually failed. listxattr can fail with at least E2BIG,
ENOTSUP, ERANGE, or anything that `stat(2)` can fail with (in my case;
ENOENT from stat).
The returned size is stored to a size_t, but the return type is a
ssize_t. On failure, listxattr returns -1, which will get translated to
size_t's MAX. If the listxattr call failed with anything other than
ENOTSUP, this triggers a request for size_t MAX bytes.
This means that, if the listxattr call fails with anything other than
ENOTSUP on save, vim will error with
`E342: Out of memory! (allocating 18446744073709551615 bytes)`
(keen observers will note 18446744073709551615 is 0xffffffffffffffff)
In reality, this is likely masking a different (usually filesystem?)
error -- but at least it's an error being pushed to the user now, and we
don't try to allocate size_t MAX bytes.
I've opted to change the type that we store listxattr to from size_t to
ssize_t, to match listxattr(2)'s signature, and to check for the -1
return value. Additionally, I've removed the errno check -- if we get a
listxattr failure for any reason, we may as well bail without trying;
it's not like we can even recover.
closes: #14169
Signed-off-by: Paul Tagliamonte <paultag@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Christian Brabandt <cb@256bit.org>
diff --git a/src/version.c b/src/version.c
index 8f28596..cc63356 100644
--- a/src/version.c
+++ b/src/version.c
@@ -705,6 +705,8 @@
static int included_patches[] =
{ /* Add new patch number below this line */
/**/
+ 162,
+/**/
161,
/**/
160,