updated for version 7.4.195
Problem: Python tests fail.
Solution: Change "then" to "than" in more places. (Dominique Pelle, Taro
Muraoka)
diff --git a/src/testdir/test87.ok b/src/testdir/test87.ok
index d1ec84c..e616544 100644
--- a/src/testdir/test87.ok
+++ b/src/testdir/test87.ok
@@ -882,11 +882,11 @@
l[:] = FailingIter():(<class 'NotImplementedError'>, NotImplementedError('iter',))
l[:] = FailingIterNext():(<class 'NotImplementedError'>, NotImplementedError('next',))
<<< Finished
-nel[1:10:2] = "abcK":(<class 'ValueError'>, ValueError('attempt to assign sequence of size greater then 2 to extended slice',))
+nel[1:10:2] = "abcK":(<class 'ValueError'>, ValueError('attempt to assign sequence of size greater than 2 to extended slice',))
(b'a', b'b', b'c', b'O')
nel[1:10:2] = "a":(<class 'ValueError'>, ValueError('attempt to assign sequence of size 1 to extended slice of size 2',))
(b'a', b'b', b'c', b'O')
-nel[1:1:-1] = "a":(<class 'ValueError'>, ValueError('attempt to assign sequence of size greater then 0 to extended slice',))
+nel[1:1:-1] = "a":(<class 'ValueError'>, ValueError('attempt to assign sequence of size greater than 0 to extended slice',))
(b'a', b'b', b'c', b'O')
nel[:] = FailingIterNextN(2):(<class 'NotImplementedError'>, NotImplementedError('next N',))
(b'a', b'b', b'c', b'O')
@@ -1233,8 +1233,8 @@
>>> Testing NumberToLong using vim.buffers[%s]
vim.buffers[[]]:(<class 'TypeError'>, TypeError('expected int() or something supporting coercing to int(), but got list',))
vim.buffers[None]:(<class 'TypeError'>, TypeError('expected int() or something supporting coercing to int(), but got NoneType',))
-vim.buffers[-1]:(<class 'ValueError'>, ValueError('number must be greater then zero',))
-vim.buffers[0]:(<class 'ValueError'>, ValueError('number must be greater then zero',))
+vim.buffers[-1]:(<class 'ValueError'>, ValueError('number must be greater than zero',))
+vim.buffers[0]:(<class 'ValueError'>, ValueError('number must be greater than zero',))
<<< Finished
> Current
>> CurrentGetattr