patch 9.0.2096: Vim9: confusing usage of private
Problem: Vim9: confusing usage of private
Solution: clarify and use protected keyword instead
[vim9class] document `_` as protected instead of private
fixes #13504
closes: #13520
Signed-off-by: Ernie Rael <errael@raelity.com>
Signed-off-by: Christian Brabandt <cb@256bit.org>
diff --git a/src/vim9expr.c b/src/vim9expr.c
index feb5df0..a79bb39 100644
--- a/src/vim9expr.c
+++ b/src/vim9expr.c
@@ -403,7 +403,7 @@
|| (type->tt_type == VAR_CLASS
&& cctx->ctx_ufunc->uf_class != cl)))
{
- semsg(_(e_cannot_access_private_method_str), name);
+ semsg(_(e_cannot_access_protected_method_str), name);
return FAIL;
}
@@ -430,7 +430,7 @@
{
if (*name == '_' && !inside_class(cctx, cl))
{
- emsg_var_cl_define(e_cannot_access_private_variable_str,
+ emsg_var_cl_define(e_cannot_access_protected_variable_str,
m->ocm_name, 0, cl);
return FAIL;
}
@@ -449,7 +449,7 @@
// Private methods are not accessible outside the class
if (*name == '_' && !inside_class(cctx, cl))
{
- semsg(_(e_cannot_access_private_method_str), fp->uf_name);
+ semsg(_(e_cannot_access_protected_method_str), fp->uf_name);
return FAIL;
}
*arg = name_end;
@@ -472,7 +472,7 @@
// it is defined.
if (*name == '_' && cctx->ctx_ufunc->uf_class != cl)
{
- emsg_var_cl_define(e_cannot_access_private_variable_str,
+ emsg_var_cl_define(e_cannot_access_protected_variable_str,
m->ocm_name, 0, cl);
return FAIL;
}
@@ -491,7 +491,7 @@
// Private methods are not accessible outside the class
if (*name == '_' && !inside_class(cctx, cl))
{
- semsg(_(e_cannot_access_private_method_str), fp->uf_name);
+ semsg(_(e_cannot_access_protected_method_str), fp->uf_name);
return FAIL;
}
*arg = name_end;