Fix some typos in Soong.
Test: m
Change-Id: I5b332ce12d70f13eca93b23060620c0ea4f46db7
diff --git a/android/testing.go b/android/testing.go
index 12e30ec..b59f399 100644
--- a/android/testing.go
+++ b/android/testing.go
@@ -376,7 +376,7 @@
var p AndroidMkEntriesProvider
var ok bool
if p, ok = mod.(AndroidMkEntriesProvider); !ok {
- t.Errorf("module does not implmement AndroidMkEntriesProvider: " + mod.Name())
+ t.Errorf("module does not implement AndroidMkEntriesProvider: " + mod.Name())
}
entries := p.AndroidMkEntries()
entries.fillInEntries(config, bpPath, mod)
@@ -387,7 +387,7 @@
var p AndroidMkDataProvider
var ok bool
if p, ok = mod.(AndroidMkDataProvider); !ok {
- t.Errorf("module does not implmement AndroidMkDataProvider: " + mod.Name())
+ t.Errorf("module does not implement AndroidMkDataProvider: " + mod.Name())
}
data := p.AndroidMk()
data.fillInData(config, bpPath, mod)
diff --git a/apex/apex.go b/apex/apex.go
index 8b0f385..0466ccb 100644
--- a/apex/apex.go
+++ b/apex/apex.go
@@ -944,7 +944,7 @@
}
if a.apexTypes.image() {
// Build rule for unflattened APEX is created even when ctx.Config().FlattenApex()
- // is true. This is to support referencing APEX via ":<module_name" syntax
+ // is true. This is to support referencing APEX via ":<module_name>" syntax
// in other modules. It is in AndroidMk where the selection of flattened
// or unflattened APEX is made.
a.buildUnflattenedApex(ctx, imageApex)
diff --git a/cc/vndk.go b/cc/vndk.go
index f9f3764..2c78047 100644
--- a/cc/vndk.go
+++ b/cc/vndk.go
@@ -31,7 +31,7 @@
// declared as a VNDK or VNDK-SP module. The vendor variant
// will be installed in /system instead of /vendor partition.
//
- // `vendor_vailable` must be explicitly set to either true or
+ // `vendor_available` must be explicitly set to either true or
// false together with `vndk: {enabled: true}`.
Enabled *bool