Add test_module_config_host
This pairs with `test_module_config` but also works on the base is a
`java_test_host` module.
e.g.
test_module_config_host {
name: "CtsOsHostTestCases_DERIVED_2566",
base: "CtsOsHostTestCases",
test_suites: ["general-tests"],
include_filters: [ "android.os.cts.StaticSharedLibsHostTests" ],
exclude_annotations: [ "androidx.test.filters.FlakyTest","org.junit.Ignore" ],
}
The new module is composed of the previous and shares much of the same
code.
With respect to build size,
Without this change, if you build CtsAppSecurityHostTestCases, there
will be several copies of the jar (and related apks) :
*) 1 in framework
out/host/linux-x86/framework/CtsAppSecurityHostTestCases.jar
*) 1 in testcases for the test
out/host/linux-x86/testcases/CtsAppSecurityHostTestCases/CtsAppSecurityHostTestCases.jar
*) 1 per compatibility suite testcases
out/host/linux-x86/mts-documentsui/android-mts-documentsui/testcases/CtsAppSecurityHostTestCases/CtsAppSecurityHostTestCases.jar
out/host/linux-x86/mts-mediaprovider/android-mts-mediaprovider/testcases/CtsAppSecurityHostTestCases/CtsAppSecurityHostTestCases.jar
out/host/linux-x86/mts/android-mts/testcases/CtsAppSecurityHostTestCases/CtsAppSecurityHostTestCases.jar
out/host/linux-x86/cts/android-cts/testcases/CtsAppSecurityHostTestCases/CtsAppSecurityHostTestCases.jar
out/host/linux-x86/mts-mainline-infra/android-mts-mainline-infra/testcases/CtsAppSecurityHostTestCases/CtsAppSecurityHostTestCases.jar
A dervived test using CtsAppSecurityHostTestCases as base adds one more
to its testcases dir:
*) derived testcase.
out/host/linux-x86/testcases/CtsAppSecurityHostTestCases_presubmit_ExternalStorageApp/CtsAppSecurityHostTestCases.jar
Fixes: b/327280990
Test: m clean && m CtsOsHostTestCases_DERIVED_2566# as above
Test: atest CtsOsHostTestCases_DERIVED_2566 --collect-tests-only
Test: migrated the 71 TestMapping instances to Android.bp and build them.
Ran tests on some of them.
Ran some original `test_module_config` tests derived from `android_test` as well
TODO: Add actions to validate the given filters are valid for the given
test apks/jars.
Change-Id: I115eedb6ff6ba8e72bb49e71867daf49d25ca0f1
diff --git a/tradefed_modules/test_module_config_test.go b/tradefed_modules/test_module_config_test.go
index ff53043..41dd3d4 100644
--- a/tradefed_modules/test_module_config_test.go
+++ b/tradefed_modules/test_module_config_test.go
@@ -16,6 +16,7 @@
import (
"android/soong/android"
"android/soong/java"
+ "strconv"
"strings"
"testing"
)
@@ -43,6 +44,7 @@
base: "base",
exclude_filters: ["android.test.example.devcodelab.DevCodelabTest#testHelloFail"],
include_annotations: ["android.platform.test.annotations.LargeTest"],
+ test_suites: ["general-tests"],
}
`
@@ -92,7 +94,7 @@
}
// Ensure we error for a base we don't support.
-func TestModuleConfigBadBaseShouldFail(t *testing.T) {
+func TestModuleConfigWithHostBaseShouldFailWithExplicitMessage(t *testing.T) {
badBp := `
java_test_host {
name: "base",
@@ -104,16 +106,60 @@
base: "base",
exclude_filters: ["android.test.example.devcodelab.DevCodelabTest#testHelloFail"],
include_annotations: ["android.platform.test.annotations.LargeTest"],
+ test_suites: ["general-tests"],
}`
- ctx := android.GroupFixturePreparers(
+ android.GroupFixturePreparers(
java.PrepareForTestWithJavaDefaultModules,
android.FixtureRegisterWithContext(RegisterTestModuleConfigBuildComponents),
).ExtendWithErrorHandler(
- android.FixtureExpectsAtLeastOneErrorMatchingPattern("does not provide test BaseTestProviderData")).
+ android.FixtureExpectsAtLeastOneErrorMatchingPattern("'java_test_host' module used as base, but 'android_test' expected")).
RunTestWithBp(t, badBp)
+}
- ctx.ModuleForTests("derived_test", "android_common")
+func TestModuleConfigBadBaseShouldFailWithGeneralMessage(t *testing.T) {
+ badBp := `
+ java_library {
+ name: "base",
+ srcs: ["a.java"],
+ }
+
+ test_module_config {
+ name: "derived_test",
+ base: "base",
+ exclude_filters: ["android.test.example.devcodelab.DevCodelabTest#testHelloFail"],
+ include_annotations: ["android.platform.test.annotations.LargeTest"],
+ test_suites: ["general-tests"],
+ }`
+
+ android.GroupFixturePreparers(
+ java.PrepareForTestWithJavaDefaultModules,
+ android.FixtureRegisterWithContext(RegisterTestModuleConfigBuildComponents),
+ ).ExtendWithErrorHandler(
+ android.FixtureExpectsOneErrorPattern("'base' module used as base but it is not a 'android_test' module.")).
+ RunTestWithBp(t, badBp)
+}
+
+func TestModuleConfigNoBaseShouldFail(t *testing.T) {
+ badBp := `
+ java_library {
+ name: "base",
+ srcs: ["a.java"],
+ }
+
+ test_module_config {
+ name: "derived_test",
+ exclude_filters: ["android.test.example.devcodelab.DevCodelabTest#testHelloFail"],
+ include_annotations: ["android.platform.test.annotations.LargeTest"],
+ test_suites: ["general-tests"],
+ }`
+
+ android.GroupFixturePreparers(
+ java.PrepareForTestWithJavaDefaultModules,
+ android.FixtureRegisterWithContext(RegisterTestModuleConfigBuildComponents),
+ ).ExtendWithErrorHandler(
+ android.FixtureExpectsOneErrorPattern("'base' field must be set to a 'android_test' module.")).
+ RunTestWithBp(t, badBp)
}
// Ensure we error for a base we don't support.
@@ -128,6 +174,7 @@
test_module_config {
name: "derived_test",
base: "base",
+ test_suites: ["general-tests"],
}`
ctx := android.GroupFixturePreparers(
@@ -152,12 +199,14 @@
name: "derived_test",
base: "base",
include_annotations: ["android.platform.test.annotations.LargeTest"],
+ test_suites: ["general-tests"],
}
test_module_config {
name: "another_derived_test",
base: "base",
include_annotations: ["android.platform.test.annotations.LargeTest"],
+ test_suites: ["general-tests"],
}`
ctx := android.GroupFixturePreparers(
@@ -190,6 +239,114 @@
}
}
+// Test_module_config_host rule is allowed to depend on java_test_host
+func TestModuleConfigHostBasics(t *testing.T) {
+ bp := `
+ java_test_host {
+ name: "base",
+ srcs: ["a.java"],
+ test_suites: ["suiteA", "general-tests", "suiteB"],
+ }
+
+ test_module_config_host {
+ name: "derived_test",
+ base: "base",
+ exclude_filters: ["android.test.example.devcodelab.DevCodelabTest#testHelloFail"],
+ include_annotations: ["android.platform.test.annotations.LargeTest"],
+ test_suites: ["general-tests"],
+ }`
+
+ ctx := android.GroupFixturePreparers(
+ java.PrepareForTestWithJavaDefaultModules,
+ android.FixtureRegisterWithContext(RegisterTestModuleConfigBuildComponents),
+ ).RunTestWithBp(t, bp)
+
+ variant := ctx.Config.BuildOS.String() + "_common"
+ derived := ctx.ModuleForTests("derived_test", variant)
+ mod := derived.Module().(*testModuleConfigHostModule)
+ allEntries := android.AndroidMkEntriesForTest(t, ctx.TestContext, mod)
+ entries := allEntries[0]
+ android.AssertArrayString(t, "", entries.EntryMap["LOCAL_MODULE"], []string{"derived_test"})
+
+ if !mod.Host() {
+ t.Errorf("host bit is not set for a java_test_host module.")
+ }
+ actualData, _ := strconv.ParseBool(entries.EntryMap["LOCAL_IS_UNIT_TEST"][0])
+ android.AssertBoolEquals(t, "LOCAL_IS_UNIT_TEST", true, actualData)
+
+}
+
+// When you pass an 'android_test' as base, the warning message is a bit obscure,
+// talking about variants, but it is something. Ideally we could do better.
+func TestModuleConfigHostBadBaseShouldFailWithVariantWarning(t *testing.T) {
+ badBp := `
+ android_test {
+ name: "base",
+ sdk_version: "current",
+ srcs: ["a.java"],
+ }
+
+ test_module_config_host {
+ name: "derived_test",
+ base: "base",
+ exclude_filters: ["android.test.example.devcodelab.DevCodelabTest#testHelloFail"],
+ include_annotations: ["android.platform.test.annotations.LargeTest"],
+ }`
+
+ android.GroupFixturePreparers(
+ java.PrepareForTestWithJavaDefaultModules,
+ android.FixtureRegisterWithContext(RegisterTestModuleConfigBuildComponents),
+ ).ExtendWithErrorHandler(
+ android.FixtureExpectsAtLeastOneErrorMatchingPattern("missing variant")).
+ RunTestWithBp(t, badBp)
+}
+
+func TestModuleConfigHostNeedsATestSuite(t *testing.T) {
+ badBp := `
+ java_test_host {
+ name: "base",
+ srcs: ["a.java"],
+ }
+
+ test_module_config_host {
+ name: "derived_test",
+ base: "base",
+ exclude_filters: ["android.test.example.devcodelab.DevCodelabTest#testHelloFail"],
+ include_annotations: ["android.platform.test.annotations.LargeTest"],
+ }`
+
+ android.GroupFixturePreparers(
+ java.PrepareForTestWithJavaDefaultModules,
+ android.FixtureRegisterWithContext(RegisterTestModuleConfigBuildComponents),
+ ).ExtendWithErrorHandler(
+ android.FixtureExpectsAtLeastOneErrorMatchingPattern("At least one test-suite must be set")).
+ RunTestWithBp(t, badBp)
+}
+
+func TestModuleConfigHostDuplicateTestSuitesGiveErrors(t *testing.T) {
+ badBp := `
+ java_test_host {
+ name: "base",
+ srcs: ["a.java"],
+ test_suites: ["general-tests", "some-compat"],
+ }
+
+ test_module_config_host {
+ name: "derived_test",
+ base: "base",
+ exclude_filters: ["android.test.example.devcodelab.DevCodelabTest#testHelloFail"],
+ include_annotations: ["android.platform.test.annotations.LargeTest"],
+ test_suites: ["general-tests", "some-compat"],
+ }`
+
+ android.GroupFixturePreparers(
+ java.PrepareForTestWithJavaDefaultModules,
+ android.FixtureRegisterWithContext(RegisterTestModuleConfigBuildComponents),
+ ).ExtendWithErrorHandler(
+ android.FixtureExpectsAtLeastOneErrorMatchingPattern("TestSuite some-compat exists in the base")).
+ RunTestWithBp(t, badBp)
+}
+
// Use for situations where the entries map contains pairs: [srcPath:installedPath1, srcPath2:installedPath2]
// and we want to compare the RHS of the pairs, i.e. installedPath1, installedPath2
func assertEntryPairValues(t *testing.T, actual []string, expected []string) {