diff --git a/android-changes-for-ndk-developers.md b/android-changes-for-ndk-developers.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..95762fe
--- /dev/null
+++ b/android-changes-for-ndk-developers.md
@@ -0,0 +1,204 @@
+# Android changes for NDK developers
+
+This document details important changes related to native code
+loading in various Android releases.
+
+Required tools: the NDK has an _arch_-linux-android-readelf binary
+(e.g. arm-linux-androideabi-readelf or i686-linux-android-readelf)
+for each architecture (under toolchains/), but you can use readelf for
+any architecture, as we will be doing basic inspection only. On Linux
+you need to have the “binutils” package installed for readelf,
+and “pax-utils” for scanelf.
+
+
+## Private API (Enforced for API level >= 24)
+
+Native libraries must use only public API, and must not link against
+non-NDK platform libraries. Starting with API 24 this rule is enforced and
+applications are no longer able to load non-NDK platform libraries. The
+rule is enforced by the dynamic linker, so non-public libraries
+are not accessible regardless of the way code tries to load them:
+System.loadLibrary, DT_NEEDED entries, and direct calls to dlopen(3)
+will all work exactly the same.
+
+Users should have a consistent app experience across updates,
+and developers shouldn't have to make emergency app updates to
+handle platform changes. For that reason, we recommend against using
+private C/C++ symbols. Private symbols aren't tested as part of the
+Compatibility Test Suite (CTS) that all Android devices must pass. They
+may not exist, or they may behave differently. This makes apps that use
+them more likely to fail on specific devices, or on future releases ---
+as many developers found when Android 6.0 Marshmallow switched from
+OpenSSL to BoringSSL.
+
+In order to reduce the user impact of this transition, we've identified
+a set of libraries that see significant use from Google Play's
+most-installed apps, and that are feasible for us to support in the
+short term (including libandroid_runtime.so, libcutils.so, libcrypto.so,
+and libssl.so). In order to give you more time to transition, we will
+temporarily support these libraries; so if you see a warning that means
+your code will not work in a future release -- please fix it now!
+
+```
+$ readelf --dynamic libBroken.so | grep NEEDED
+ 0x00000001 (NEEDED)                     Shared library: [libnativehelper.so]
+ 0x00000001 (NEEDED)                     Shared library: [libutils.so]
+ 0x00000001 (NEEDED)                     Shared library: [libstagefright_foundation.so]
+ 0x00000001 (NEEDED)                     Shared library: [libmedia_jni.so]
+ 0x00000001 (NEEDED)                     Shared library: [liblog.so]
+ 0x00000001 (NEEDED)                     Shared library: [libdl.so]
+ 0x00000001 (NEEDED)                     Shared library: [libz.so]
+ 0x00000001 (NEEDED)                     Shared library: [libstdc++.so]
+ 0x00000001 (NEEDED)                     Shared library: [libm.so]
+ 0x00000001 (NEEDED)                     Shared library: [libc.so]
+```
+
+*Potential problems*: starting from API 24 the dynamic linker will not
+load private libraries, preventing the application from loading.
+
+*Resolution*: rewrite your native code to rely only on public API. As a
+short term workaround, platform libraries without complex dependencies
+(libcutils.so) can be copied to the project. As a long term solution
+the relevant code must be copied to the project tree. SSL/Media/JNI
+internal/binder APIs should not be accessed from the native code. When
+necessary, native code should call appropriate public Java API methods.
+
+A complete list of public libraries is available within the NDK, under
+platforms/android-API/usr/lib.
+
+Note: SSL/crypto is a special case, applications must NOT use platform
+libcrypto and libssl libraries directly, even on older platforms. All
+applications should use GMS Security Provider to ensure they are protected
+from known vulnerabilities.
+
+
+## Missing Section Headers (Enforced for API level >= 24)
+
+Each ELF file has additional information contained in the section
+headers. These headers must be present now, because the dynamic linker
+uses them for sanity checking. Some developers strip them in an
+attempt to obfuscate the binary and prevent reverse engineering. (This
+doesn't really help because it is possible to reconstruct the stripped
+information using widely-available tools.)
+
+```
+$ readelf --header libBroken.so | grep 'section headers'
+  Start of section headers:          0 (bytes into file)
+  Size of section headers:           0 (bytes)
+  Number of section headers:         0
+```
+
+*Resolution*: remove the extra steps from your build that strip section
+headers.
+
+## Text Relocations (Enforced for API level >= 23)
+
+Starting with API 23, shared objects must not contain text
+relocations. That is, the code must be loaded as is and must not be
+modified. Such an approach reduces load time and improves security.
+
+The usual reason for text relocations is non-position independent
+hand-written assembler. This is not common. Use the scanelf tool as
+described in our documentation for further diagnostics:
+
+```
+$ scanelf -qT libTextRel.so
+  libTextRel.so: (memory/data?) [0x15E0E2] in (optimized out: previous simd_broken_op1) [0x15E0E0]
+  libTextRel.so: (memory/data?) [0x15E3B2] in (optimized out: previous simd_broken_op2) [0x15E3B0]
+  ...
+```
+
+If you have no scanelf tool available, it is possible to do a basic
+check with readelf instead, look for either a TEXTREL entry or the
+TEXTREL flag. Either alone is sufficient. (The value corresponding to the
+TEXTREL entry is irrelevant and typically 0 --- simply the presence of
+the TEXTREL entry declares that the .so contains text relocations). This
+example has both indicators present:
+
+```
+$ readelf --dynamic libTextRel.so | grep TEXTREL
+ 0x00000016 (TEXTREL)                    0x0
+ 0x0000001e (FLAGS)                      SYMBOLIC TEXTREL BIND_NOW
+```
+
+Note: it is technically possible to have a shared object with the TEXTREL
+entry/flag but without any actual text relocations. This doesn't happen
+with the NDK, but if you're generating ELF files yourself make sure
+you're not generating ELF files that claim to have text relocations,
+because the Android dynamic linker trusts the entry/flag.
+
+*Potential problems*: Relocations enforce code pages being writable, and
+wastefully increase the number of dirty pages in memory. The dynamic
+linker has issued warnings about text relocations since Android K
+(API 19), but on API 23 and above it refuses to load code with text
+relocations.
+
+*Resolution*: rewrite assembler to be position independent to ensure
+no text relocations are necessary. The
+[Gentoo Textrels guide](https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Hardened/Textrels_Guide)
+has instructions for fixing text relocations, and more detailed
+[scanelf documentation](https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Hardened/PaX_Utilities).
+
+
+## Invalid DT_NEEDED Entries (Enforced for API level >= 23)
+
+While library dependencies (DT_NEEDED entries in the ELF headers) can be
+absolute paths, that doesn't make sense on Android because you have
+no control over where your library will be installed by the system. A
+DT_NEEDED entry should be the same as the needed library's SONAME,
+leaving the business of finding the library at runtime to the dynamic
+linker.
+
+Before API 23, Android's dynamic linker ignored the full path, and
+used only the basename (the part after the last ‘/') when looking
+up the required libraries. Since API 23 the runtime linker will honor
+the DT_NEEDED exactly and so it won't be able to load the library if
+it is not present in that exact location on the device.
+
+Even worse, some build systems have bugs that cause them to insert
+DT_NEEDED entries that point to a file on the build host, something that
+cannot be found on the device.
+
+```
+$ readelf --dynamic libSample.so | grep NEEDED
+ 0x00000001 (NEEDED)                     Shared library: [libm.so]
+ 0x00000001 (NEEDED)                     Shared library: [libc.so]
+ 0x00000001 (NEEDED)                     Shared library: [libdl.so]
+ 0x00000001 (NEEDED)                     Shared library:
+[C:\Users\build\Android\ci\jni\libBroken.so]
+```
+
+*Potential problems*: before API 23 the DT_NEEDED entry's basename was
+used, but starting from API 23 the Android runtime will try to load the
+library using the path specified, and that path won't exist on the
+device. There are broken third-party toolchains/build systems that use
+a path on a build host instead of the SONAME.
+
+*Resolution*: make sure all required libraries are referenced by SONAME
+only. It is better to let the runtime linker to find and load those
+libraries as the location may change from device to device.
+
+
+## Missing SONAME (Enforced for API level >= 23)
+
+Each ELF shared object (“native library”) must have a SONAME (Shared
+Object Name) attribute. The NDK toolchain adds this attribute by default,
+so its absence indicates either a misconfigured alternative toolchain
+or a misconfiguration in your build system. A missing SONAME may lead
+to runtime issues such as the wrong library being loaded: the filename
+is used instead when this attribute is missing.
+
+```
+$ readelf --dynamic libWithSoName.so | grep SONAME
+ 0x0000000e (SONAME)                     Library soname: [libWithSoName.so]
+```
+
+*Potential problems*: namespace conflicts may lead to the wrong library
+being loaded at runtime, which leads to crashes when required symbols
+are not found, or you try to use an ABI-incompatible library that isn't
+the library you were expecting.
+
+*Resolution*: the current NDK generates the correct SONAME by
+default. Ensure you're using the current NDK and that you haven't
+configured your build system to generate incorrect SONAME entries (using
+the -soname linker option).